Search for: "People v. Grant" Results 8661 - 8680 of 16,996
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2015, 9:50 am by Old Fox
Wilson has a well-cited quote, calling the Python the "Rolls-Royce of Colt revolvers" and the well-known British author and firearms expert Ian V. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:07 pm
First, EPA and Iowa don’t consider districts a point source so there are no rules or standards for how to grant them permits to control discharges – like other point sources. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm by John Elwood
Petitioner explicitly asks only that the Court “GVR” — grant the petition, vacate the judgment below, and remand for consideration in light of precedents the court below previously did not have occasion to consider. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 9:14 am by Dennis Crouch
As such, it belongs to juridical persons accused of infringement (people, corporations, etc.), not the good itself.[14] Although we might talk in shorthand about the patented good traveling in commerce unencumbered by patent rights, a patent grants to its owner the right to exclude others (people, corporations, etc.) from infringing the patent. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:00 am by Maureen Johnston
Alabama adopts a new substantive rule that applies retroactively on collateral review to people condemned as juveniles to die in prison. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
Such accounts, however, neglect the criminal law’s ability to detain people for preventive reasons in the pretrial stage of the criminal process. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:34 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
At the end of the day, however, caring for people requires the human touch. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 9:15 am by Doorey
For a good case to give you a sense of how courts deal with picketing that slows people from entering the place struck, read this case called Cancoil Thermal Corp. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 10:30 pm by Elizabeth A. Bokermann, Esquire
 Additionally, the court simultaneously makes a decision, using many factors, on whether alimony should be granted. [read post]