Search for: "Times-Review"
Results 8661 - 8680
of 183,202
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2020, 6:42 am
Doe, shared their views on working for Kraken, which ranged from praising the “skilled, knowledgeable, and nice colleagues” to a personal reflection that “I personally had a deep sense of trepidation much of the time. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 10:14 am
Under the now defunct Parent Coordination Pilot Program which we have blogged on many times in the past, recommendations of a parent coordinator, if accepted, were to immediately become a court order. [read post]
16 Feb 2019, 8:00 am
The European Union in International Law Book ReviewsFelix Lange, reviewing Samuel Moyn, Not Enough: Human Rights in an Unequal World Diane A Desierto, reviewing Oisin Suttle, Distributive Justice and World Trade Law: A Political Theory of International Trade Regulation Marko Milanovic, reviewing Diane Orentlicher, Some Kind of Justice: The ICTY’s Impact in Bosnia and Serbia Dana Burchardt, reviewing Jean d’Aspremont, International Law as a Belief… [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 12:30 am
Here's a collection of book reviews for this weekend:Tm Weiner's book, One Man Against the World: The Tragedy of Richard Nixon (Holt) is adapted for essay form in The Nation, and is reviewed by the History News Network here.Christopher Dickey's Our Man in Charleston: Britain's Secret Agent in the Civil War South (Crown) is reviewed in The New York Times here and in excerpt form in The Daily Beast here. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 9:30 pm
Boyer and Mark Nicholls in the London Review of Books. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 11:19 am
Wednesday, May 22, 2013 1:00pm - 2:00pm The America Invents Act: Litigation in the Patent OfficeHow to Take Advantage of the New Inter Partes Review Process The America Invents Act includes a new inter partes review procedure that takes the place of the old inter partes reexamination. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 8:28 am
The Admissibility Review Office (ARO) in Washington, DC approved the waiver for the longest period of time allowed under the law, namely 5 years. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 11:01 am
Khashoggi, says the Times. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 6:24 am
The court merely held that a time-barred claim could not be made timely by styling a past breach as a continuing violation. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 11:30 pm
They will take the time to gather evidence, review discovery and prepare an argument. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 7:54 am
In so ruling, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court confirmed that the standard of review in this context did not require a finding of intent on the part of the plaintiff or prejudice to the defendant under the analysis develop through Lamp v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 8:11 am
While full time at the LSU Law Library, I also established and managed a one-person medical library in a specialty discipline for 14 years on a part-time basis, giving me an entre into the world of medical librarianship. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
Therefore, the next time you train your employees on your social-media policy -- You do train on your policies, right? [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 1:00 am
Review the filing a "final time," then a third, fourth, and fifth time before pushing that filing through the mail slot for pick-up. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 10:59 pm
With apologies, the Justice Department said it had underestimated the time it would take to complete the responses, and get the secret information in them reviewed by the Central Intelligence Agency before passing them along to the courts. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 11:39 am
But at least I only had to reconnect 47 times. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 5:16 pm
The best thing to do at this point is to review the DACA requirements and set aside the supporting documents needed for your application. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 3:12 pm
For the dissent, the answer is yes, because state law doesn't treat the mechanisms for review in the court of appeal and the state supreme court as "direct review. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 6:43 pm
§ 314(d)’s bar of judicial review forinstitution decisions or Nidec’s argument that the Board’spractice of expanding panels violates due process. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 8:23 am
At the hearing the Union argued, among other points, that the Company had failed to have grievant sign Attendance Review/Reports, and had failed to timely provide certain documents to it.Arbitrator Barbara Doering concluded that while the Company had done as the Union alleged, these actions didn't change the fact that the grievant had "knowingly and with intent to deceive" entered the wrong start time on the documents. [read post]
