Search for: "United States v. Close" Results 8661 - 8680 of 14,200
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2013, 12:22 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California denied Sequenom’s motion for a preliminary injunction to prevent Ariosa from making, using, or selling that test. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 11:13 am
Unless overturned by the United States Supreme Court, these two decisions affirm substantial rights for collegiate athletes to protect the use of their likeness for commercial purposes without their consent. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 10:05 am by Tom Webley
To have jurisdiction over a case, a federal court must find that the plaintiffs satisfy Article III of the United States Constitution, including by alleging that they have suffered an injury-in-fact. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 4:00 am by David Oscar Markus
The blog has discussed this issue before, and the last time, the case went all the way to the Supreme Court.This time, in United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 6:34 pm by Benjamin Wittes
More recently, in the 2008 military commission case of U.S. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 11:00 am by Paul Rosenzweig
   If the United States government can encrypt its data, so can China, or the Russian mob, or a Mexican drug cartel. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 2:47 am by Florian Mueller
Again, why is something that's fine in Europe not fine in the United States? [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 9:31 pm by Patrick S. O'Donnell
The court noted that ‘the near-universal and firmly established common-law rule in the United States flatly prohibited the admission of juror testimony to impeach a jury verdict. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 2:38 pm by Eugene Volokh
Poverty can be grim and corrosive, and social mobility in the United States is not what it used to be. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 4:11 am by Peter Margulies
Third, Steve asserts that the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces’ decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:42 am by Florian Mueller
I just watched the live webcast of today's hearing of the Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights of the Judiciary Committee of the United States Senate on "Standard Essential Patent [SEP] Disputes and Antitrust Law". [read post]