Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 8661 - 8680 of 10,395
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm by The Docket Navigator
Basic information about a patent, such as the filing, issue and priority dates associated with a particular U.S. patent number are available at, for example, the website of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, (“USPTO”). [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 12:24 am
As a common law principle, the banking sector has long functioned under the value of confidentiality, largely embodied in the famous 1924 United Kingdom decision, Tournier v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 7:31 am by admin
But work on the reservoir has stopped as Governor Crist has looked to put his own mark on restoration of the Everglades with the United States Sugar deal. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 2:12 am by gmlevine
“[I]t does not appear that [Complainant’s] mark is used outside the United States (aside from the fact that Internet users worldwide presumably can view Complainant’s website). [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:46 pm by Rick
  His proposal, however, misses the mark primarily because it adheres to the misguided belief in the need to “balance” the work of the government — in this case, law enforcement officers — against the rights recognized as inviolable by the Constitution. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm by Brendan Kevenides
Nowhere else in the United States has a state high court declared that bicyclists are not the intended users of the very paved streets for which their two-wheeling forebearers advocated. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 11:52 am
This December the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decided a significant case interpreting the false marking provision of United States Patent Law. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
The United States Government, through the arguments of Neal K. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
The United States Government, through the arguments of Neal K. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 2:20 am by gmlevine
“The Respondent has stated that it did not know of the Complainant or its registration for the Trade Mark when the Respondent registered the disputed domain name. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:45 pm
(Spicy IP)   Ireland New guidelines for dealing with extensions in time (Class 46)   Malta International: Malta announces tax exemption for patent royalties (IP finance)   Poland Time of bad faith in trade mark application (Class 46)   South Africa World Cup 2010: Fake shirts pour in (Afro-IP)   Spain Court elaborates on ‘trade mark families’ (Class 46)   United Kingdom Unilever threatens legal action against BNP to prevent Marmite… [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 7:05 pm by Gideon
LaFave, Search and Seizure [3d Ed. 1996] § 3.5 [b], p. 259 n.46.); State v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 5:36 pm by azatty
United States, the case that had upheld the federal government’s exclusion and internment of United States citizens. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:37 am by admin
Condon with 437 cases  4.6% of total cases The top 10 most active panelists are all from the United States. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 7:39 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2002) (internal quotation marks deleted)). [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 7:10 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This case, was decided on April 5, 2010, in the United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 4:32 am
Yozmot 33 Limited (EPLAW)   United States US General Comcast owes P2P users $16; yes, they should take it (Ars Technica) Dow Jones files hot news misappropriation suit against Breifing.com (The Trademark Blog)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC affirms ITC’s findings that Global Locate has standing, SiRF directly infringes patents: SiRF v ITC (ITC 337 Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) District Court E D Texas: Challenge to… [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 4:45 pm by Jim Gerl
Image via WikipediaJustice John Paul Stevens has announced his retirement from the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 8:25 am
 Rather than accept defeat, it appealed the TTAB decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]