Search for: "Does 1 to 10" Results 8681 - 8700 of 42,998
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2007, 3:02 am
Halvey does not think firms like his will outsource legal work and, if they do, they will not want to share. 10. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 3:47 am by Eleonora Rosati
 The EUIPO examiner refused registration on grounds that the sign applied for would be contrary to ‘accepted principles of morality’ under Article 7(1)(f) EUTMR.The wording of this absolute ground, which cannot be overcome by, e.g., inherent or acquired distinctiveness of the sign at hand, states that:1. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 4:00 am
----Note: 19 states have banned texting while driving: Alaska, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois (eff. 1/10), Louisiana, Maryland, Minnesota, New Hampshire (eff. 1/10), New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Oregon (eff. 1/10), Rhode Island, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 8:50 pm by Bradley S. Shear, Esq.
Some "Facebook Friends" are people with whom you have not spoken with for 10-20 years, while others may only be "Facebook Friends" of "Facebook Friends. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 7:28 pm by William Jaksa
There also does not necessarily be any spoken words at all. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 11:59 am by Andy
Why does this lack of a universally-accepted definition of 'derivative work' matter? [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 5:18 am
  My prior blog post https://telefrieden.blogspot.com/2023/10/upcoming-limits-on-fcc-statutory.html noted that an expansive reading of West Virginia. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 5:18 am
  My prior blog post https://telefrieden.blogspot.com/2023/10/upcoming-limits-on-fcc-statutory.html noted that an expansive reading of West Virginia. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Comment Eagerly awaited by media lawyers, this decision does not provide the clarity on the recoverability of additional liabilities which might have been hoped. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 2:46 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
-Appellant’s Reply Br. at 10; see also Compl. at 1, Novartis Vaccines & Diagnostics, Inc. v. [read post]