Search for: "Does 1-27" Results 8681 - 8700 of 12,455
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2012, 11:36 pm
., Friday, April 27.This statement is too laconic, and does not elaborate on what "impos[ing] a sharing arrangement" would mean. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:17 am by John Day
Code Ann. 28-1- 106, does not apply to statutes of repose. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 12:19 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Lord Hope considered that in making a determination as to the ambit of Article 5(1), the purpose of the interference with liberty could be viewed as relevant; if so, he found that it must be to enable a balance to be struck between what the restriction sought to achieve and the interests of the individual (at para. 27). [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 9:18 am by Christina D. Frangiosa
The Court instead concluded that "the right and ability to control infringing activity under § 512(c)(1)(B) 'requires something more than the ability to remove or block access to materials posted on a service provider's website.'" Id. at 27 (quoting Capitol Records, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:38 am
Currently The Directive seems not to address the point, but Art. 48(1) CTMR does, saying simply that "The Community trade mark shall not be altered in the Register during the period of registration or on renewal thereof". [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 1:29 am by FDABlog HPM
District Court for the District of Columbia challenging FDA’s approval of three ANDAs for generic versions of ViroPharma’s VANCOCIN (vancomycin HCl) Capsules (Case No. 1:12-cv-00584-ESH). [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 10:15 pm by Leland E. Beck
  OMB does not appear to have completed review of any “significant” rules, but one rule that OMB cleared illustrates a flaw in the transparency of the review process. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 5:59 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
In 1913, first tax code was 27 pages long; now 5300 pages.Almanac. [read post]
14 Apr 2012, 9:32 am by rquintilone
It means that the employer (1) relieves the employee of all duty for an (2) uninterrupted thirty minute period [for example permits the employee to leave the work premises] and  (3) does not discourage the break. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 9:24 am
Our next “Immigration Q & A Forum” is scheduled for Friday, April 27, 2012! [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 5:58 pm by Andy Dorchak
The Supreme Court, to my knowledge, does not provide translations of its opinions into foreign languages.) [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 9:57 pm by kfogel
  The resultant dataset is useable by anyone, and saves people from having to pay Canada Post $5000 CAD for an official copy.So what does Canada Post do? [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
The Board does not have any criticism against the OD’s approach. [read post]