Search for: "Key v State"
Results 8681 - 8700
of 22,474
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2014, 6:28 am
The first article in the issue is titled “Plessy v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 6:28 am
The first article in the issue is titled “Plessy v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 2:37 pm
Rainsford v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 4:03 pm
Just one day before Equal Pay Day, April 10, 2018, the Ninth Circuit in Rizo v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 10:22 am
The case, Quon v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 8:52 am
Court of Appeals, Second Circuit decision in Connecticut v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:01 am
Chen v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 2:41 pm
- Gideon Kanner's takedown of the recent California Court of Appeal decision in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 3:00 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 3:36 am
Van Patten appealed, arguing that representation by speaker phone was "presumptively ineffective" -- ineffectiveness of counsel is often a key element in reversing a conviction or sentence. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 12:13 pm
From car accidents, to premises liability, to product liability - determining whether another person or entity is negligent is key to allowing you to recover for your injuries. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
See SEC v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 5:42 am
The Law Offices of Leah V. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 1:46 am
This dispute could become the next Microsoft v. [read post]
10 Nov 2018, 11:16 am
On Tuesday I mostly wanted to publish the news quickly, and I focused on the commercial consequences.The legal standard applied by Judge Koh was stated as follows in the Ninth Circuit's 2006 opinion in Miller v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 1:49 pm
In Texas v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:39 am
As stated in the first part, “[g]iven that the key concerns against the CAB was that if passed, it may end up before the ConCourt, it appears the Court’s decision in Blind SA v Minister for Trade, Industry and Competition & others may offer a foretaste of what could happen should the CAB end up before that court”. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 2:11 am
a) Geographical Requirements and Data Transfer Issues Geographically, Section 393 SGB V requires that health and social data may only be processed In Germany, In an EU or EEA member state, or In a third country under an adequacy decision by the European Commission. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
If all three key questions that that case sets forth are answered yes, then there is immunity. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 6:46 am
., Ltd. v. [read post]
