Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 8681 - 8700
of 16,401
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2014, 5:00 am
U.S. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 10:31 am
Latimer v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 8:02 am
Co. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 6:52 am
One of my favorites is the Petitioner’s brief in Miranda v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 2:38 am
" [So that means it's a strong mark? [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
In a recent ruling, Connor H. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 6:17 pm
In 1989, with torches and pitchforks, Congress chased the Tariff Schedule of the United States away from our black and white villages, never to be seen again. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 10:46 am
Over the weekend, the United States and its allies conducted 22 air strikes against ISIS forces inside Iraq. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 2:10 am
This question was answered first when gaming was in its infancy, but still remains quite relevant in today's world of gaming and law.The case in question was Atari v North American Philips Consumer Electronics, decided by the United States Court of Appeals in 1982. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 6:05 pm
Šmejkal, Václav, CJEU and the Social Market Economy Goal of the EU (October 22, 2014). [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm
Exxon survey: Nike v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:46 am
What’s the relevance of the economist v. legal scholars? [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 5:40 am
Ohio's 2nd District Court of Appeal had found the accident to be compensable, relying on the dual-purpose doctrine in reaching that conclusion.The Ohio Supreme Court reversed the 2nd DCA, saying there was no causal relationship between the worker's job and the accident.Last year, the 5th District Court of Appeals ruled in Friebel v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Cotton & Ors, R (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Ors [2014] EWHC 3437 (Admin) This was the Liberty backed judicial review of the bedroom tax regulations on the basis that the regulations amounted to an article 8 breach, or an article 14 breach read with article 8, or that the regulations were irrational. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 3:21 pm
The New Jersey Appellate Court case of Faro v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 11:06 am
” In the book, Katagiri notes that “when insurgent groups challenge powerful states, defeat is not always inevitable,” and examines “the circumstances and tactics” that allow non-state actors to succeed “against foreign governments while others fail. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 9:46 am
Andrus Ansip is nominally the “team leader” on the reforms, with Věra Jourová, Günther Oettinger and Dimitris Avramopoulos competing to be heard on the balance between fundamental rights, business freedoms and the powers of public authorities (e.g. state surveillance), respectively. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 7:08 am
" Ziptronix, Inc. v. [read post]
