Search for: "True v True"
Results 8681 - 8700
of 33,962
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2017, 5:15 pm
In the earlier case of Vringo v. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 4:05 pm
Mr Speker cites the case of Economou v de Freitas, about which – as the trial judge – I should make no comment. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 10:32 am
Marianne Bowler used the recent United States Supreme Court decision in Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 10:06 am
The Supreme Court issued its landmark opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 4:30 pm
Yeager v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 7:44 am
Buetow v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 2:54 am
The Indiana Court of Appeals say no in Garcia-Torres v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 6:21 am
A lot of great commentary on yesterday's decision in Crawford v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 12:45 pm
US District Court for the District of Maryland: US v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 1:56 pm
A recent Michigan Court of Appeals decision, Alfieri et al. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 1:12 pm
No, says the Indiana Court of Appeals in Garcia-Torres v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 7:41 am
Today her prediction proved true, with the Court denying review (without any comment) of the seven petitions: Bogan v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
David the First spoke about cybercrime and wondered in particular why there had been so few convictions; his ‘three generations of cybercrime’ were very useful (traditional, hybrid and ‘true’). [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 9:16 am
But if Douglas v. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 3:32 am
Do we have evidence this is true, other than claims that it happens? [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:04 pm
The same is true of sealing orders. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 5:12 am
Cleveland Clinic Found., 2016-Ohio-7432 (“A true statute of repose . . . applies to vested and nonvested claims. [read post]
22 May 2016, 11:16 am
But evidence of true machine intelligence outside of very narrow domains like chess remained illusory. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 10:39 am
LEXIS 165 (May 31, 2007): It is true that other states have limited searches incident to arrest to Terry-type frisks, State v. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 4:51 am
In considering a motion to dismiss a complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), “the court must accept the facts as alleged in the complaint as true, accord plaintiffs the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory” (Mawere v Landau, 130 AD3d at 988 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Hall v Hobbick, 192 AD3d at 777-778). [read post]
