Search for: "United States v. Close" Results 8681 - 8700 of 14,200
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2013, 2:41 am by Florian Mueller
Between 1 AM and 2 AM local time on Sunday, Samsung's counsel in the intellectual property dispute with Apple notified the court of a "final" Office action by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) rejecting all claims of Apple's pinch-to-zoom API patent, U.S. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 4:52 pm by Stephen Bilkis
On 5 January 2009, the United States Attorneys' Office for the Southern District of New York filed a complaint against K charging him with extortion and stalking under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 1:32 am
As Amazon is not to be seen under items I to V, Amazon does not fall under vi. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 10:24 am by Jeff Redding
  As a result, it was arguably harder for Justice Kennedy to make United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 4:31 pm
But, alas, now it has come to a close with the United States Supreme Court once again deciding not to hear a case regarding attorney advertising regulation. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 8:05 am by The Charge
  Considered a "landmark case", Epperson v. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 3:35 pm by Mark Litwak
Mills, chief judge of the United States District Court Northern District of Mississippi, found in favor of Sony and dismissed the complaint. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am by Larry Catá Backer
This paper considers societal constitutionalism in its dynamic element—as a system structures constant adjustment among the constituting elements of a governance unit (whether state, corporation, religion, etc.) [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm by Steve Sady
§ 4B1.2, which automatically increase the sentencing range to close to the statutory maximum by increasing the Criminal History Category to VI and adding levels to the total offense level. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 4:32 am
The United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia emphasized this point in American Legion John Radcliff Post 164 v. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
  He ordered Verizon to turn over “telephony metadata”—essentially call logs—of all calls in which at least one party was in the United States; and he forbade Verizon from informing its customers that their phone activity (though not the content of their conversations) would be shared with the government in this way. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 4:24 pm by Amy Hocevar
  The Sixth Circuit has not fared well in recent years before the United States Supreme Court in terms of the rate at which the Supreme Court has reversed the Circuit. [read post]