Search for: "A B"
Results 8701 - 8720
of 158,544
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2012, 9:30 am
David Segal has provided blog fodder for us before, both in his role as the bête noire of the legal profession, and in his more mild-mannered guise as author of the New York Times' column "The Haggler" (lacking a public... [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:40 am
Camilla B. [read post]
24 May 2013, 8:18 am
A (presumably U.S.) buyer (identified on the web only as "b-thumper") ordered a BMW M3 in "Atlantis Blue with Blue deviated stitching and the Individual Piano trim" and paid for European delivery. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 8:53 pm
Grade: B+ [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 1:30 pm
Interpreting Rule 1.6(b)(1) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct in the context of wrongful convictions is complicated by evidentiary and practical considerations surrounding the potential use of such information. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 12:33 pm
Arizona Rule of Evidence 804(b)(1) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for Former testimony in criminal actions or proceedings as provided in Rule 19.3(c), Rules of Criminal Procedure. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 10:00 am
Robert B. [read post]
18 Mar 2007, 7:24 pm
By: Scott B. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 10:00 am
Stephanie B. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 12:42 pm
From Southern Echo: Anti-immigrant HB 488 passes House Committee Judiciary B; sent to House Education Committee Good People, On Friday, Feb. 24, after two hours of discussion, debate and defeat of 3 of the 4 proposed amendments, the House Judiciary... [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 8:57 am
Whiting has refused to enjoin Section 2(B) of Arizona's S.B. 1070. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:02 am
Ari B. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 4:19 pm
Jon B. [read post]
11 May 2015, 11:38 am
It is my pleasure to introduce a wonderful new article by our co-blogger James B. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 9:36 am
North Carolina Rule of Evidence 1101(b)(3) indicates that the North Carolina Rules of Evidence do not apply at probation revocation proceedings. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 10:41 am
Here is the abstract: In Judging the Voting Rights Act, Professors Adam B. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 6:32 am
This decision from the Fifth District points out that the time period for filing a motion for costs (or, it would seem, a motion for fees) can be extended by timely filing a motion for extension of time under rule 1.090(b) and showing good cause. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 1:23 pm
Eugene B. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 12:46 pm
How To Deal With An Unreasonable Family Court Judge There is an old joke that goes around law schools, it says that “A” students end up working for “B” students […]The post How To Deal With An Unreasonable Judge appeared first on Family Law in Minnesota. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:49 am
(Due process rights; claim trial court abused its discretion under Connecticut Code of Evidence § 4-5 (b)) [read post]
