Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 8701 - 8720
of 13,916
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2018, 10:22 am
Seal Beach Police Officers Assn. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 1:03 am
Captain Little, the officer involved in one oft-cited case, Little v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:43 am
Finally, the Court has rescheduled Lui v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 3:27 am
As the Court of Appeals held in Murray v Murphy, 24 NY2d 150, in order to satisfy due process, a notice of the charges must be given to the employee so that he or she may mount an adequate defense, if one is available. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 8:08 am
Case information Sovereign General Insurance Company v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 12:53 pm
Bush, and No. 06-1196, Al Odah v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 3:51 pm
My prior orders in this matter are therefore final and preclusive on all issues decided therein as to others who could have, but did not appeal, such as the Office of Personnel Management ("OPM") and the Administrative Office of the United States Courts. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 3:39 am
Susan V. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 4:00 am
This Court has long recognized that, as a general principle, the end does not justify the means (R. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 7:22 am
Conversant brought an administrative lawsuit challenging that ruling in the Beijing Intellectual Property Court. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm
Tallent v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 9:08 am
The court also barred certain CEQA claims for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 4:40 am
At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman analyzes the briefs filed by the Office of the Solicitor General at the Court’s invitation and concludes that “the SG is cautious about recommending cases to the Court, and as an entity would prefer to deny cases that are on the margin to keep the number of recommended grants low. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 9:12 am
The divorce case of Iliff v. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 12:25 pm
Courts agree. [read post]
5 Oct 2008, 7:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 4:33 am
”In contrast, however, as the prevailing party, the court said that Kaefer was entitled to attorney fees pursuant to the New York State Equal Access to Justice Act (CPLR §8601).* "Seasonal Appointment Letters" sent to Kaefer stated that "You should understand, however, that your employment relationship with the Office of Parks, Recreation & Historic Preservation is only temporary. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 4:23 am
For example, in Triplett v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 5:36 am
Supreme Court, which issued a temporary administrative stay . [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm
Courts have often expressed—as the Supreme Court did in United States v. [read post]
