Search for: "Does 1-27" Results 8701 - 8720 of 12,455
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am by Kevin LaCroix
A substantially similar version of this article was initially published in Issue No. 1 2012 of the Business Law News of the California State Bar. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
It does not apply to non-ERISA plans such as governmental or non-electing church plans and it does not apply to IRAs or non-qualified annuities. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 9:54 am by Gretchen Harders
  This does not preclude the possibility of Congressional efforts to address the individual mandate or other aspects of PPACA with a legislative “fix. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 8:29 am by Eric Schweibenz
” On January 27, 2012, the Commission determined to review and reverse ALJ Essex’s ID and deny the motion to amend the Notice of Investigation. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 12:49 am by Guest Blogger
I’m claiming, at most, merely that it’s right.1. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 2:31 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Section 1731(c)(1) provided that "[a]ny rejection form that does not specifically comply with this section is void. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 7:58 pm by FDABlog HPM
”  Under FDC Act § 505(q), which FDA has interpreted to apply only to certain petitions submitted to the Agency after September 27, 2007, “[FDA] shall take final agency action on a petition not later than 180 days after the date on which the petition is submitted. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:30 pm by Patti Spencer
"    Day Two :The individual mandate portion of the law goes into effect on January 1, 2014. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 11:50 am by Don Burton
1 decision (Allen dissented) enjoined enforcement of the penalty against Filburn. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 10:42 am by lennyesq
ME Forensics New Business DCJS Annual Reporting - Part 1, Part 2, Part 3 Old Business OIG Report- Nassau Tags: Forensic science [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 10:11 am by William A. Ruskin
” Unlike some states, New York does not recognize an independent tort claim for third-party negligent spoliation of evidence. [read post]