Search for: "MRS v. State" Results 8701 - 8720 of 21,763
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2015, 4:00 am by Tim Sitzmann
The DC Comics Robin isn’t even the only well-known fictional Robin (looking at you, Mr. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:36 am
More detailed consideration may follow in due course.IPKat readers who have followed this saga will know that earlier this year Mr Justice Arnold gave the first detailed consideration of what a Swiss-form claim means, see blog post here and here. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Copyright Office: Jacqueline CharlesworthMichelle ChoeRegan SmithCy DonnellySteve RuheJohn RileyStacy Cheney (NTIA) Proposed Class 5: Audiovisual works – derivative uses – multimedia e-books This proposed class would allow circumvention of access controls on lawfully made and acquired motion pictures used in connection with multimedia e-book authorship. [read post]
28 May 2015, 5:09 am by John Floyd
” One of those cases was the 2012 decision by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 9:22 am by Ben
 The author's Estate, which has been involved in several high-profile legal battles, now claims that the plot of the new film "Mr Holmes" infringes on the Conan Doyle's short story, "The Adventure of the Blanched Soldier" published in 1926 in Strand magazine. [read post]
25 May 2015, 7:04 am by Graham Smith
Mr Justice Lightman gave an answer to that question in 1999 in Victor Chandler International v HM Customs and Excise:“In summary, a document is a material object which contains information capable of extraction from it (e.g. a tape so long as it is not blank). [read post]
24 May 2015, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
United States A libel claim brought by a Philadelphia firefighter against the New York Daily News has been dismissed. [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:00 am by INFORRM
The defendant relied on the judgment of Lord Dyson in the Supreme Court case of R (Lumba) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2012] 1 AC 245 [101]), in which he disapproved the concept of “vindicatory damages”. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:39 am
 Mr Justice Birss decided in a compact and very readable judgment that both aspects of the invention were novel and not obvious:Synthon had not established that the skilled person would necessarily note the brominated side-products in routine analysis of the product. [read post]