Search for: "United States v. Close"
Results 8701 - 8720
of 14,200
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2013, 10:38 am
As part of my continuing series of famous case law that came from the California Court system, I wanted to discuss what is probably one of the most cited authorities throughout the United States on personal injury law as it relates to claims for emotional distress. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 12:12 pm
” However, both of these exemptions require that the fund securities must be offered and sold without any marketing to the public in the United States. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 10:59 am
Each of those pre-1923 works is now in the public domain in the United States. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 9:42 am
In the famous case R.A.V. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm
Part III then turns to a close study of the cooperative and its constraints, starting with a consideration of the agricultural cooperative as template for changes. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 3:03 pm
See United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 2:08 pm
Thirty-five years ago the Supreme Court of the United States held that in the context of higher education a state university that uses race as one of its admissions criteria must show that the use is "narrowly tailored to serve a compelling governmental interest." [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 2:08 pm
Thirty-five years ago the Supreme Court of the United States held that in the context of higher education a state university that uses race as one of its admissions criteria must show that the use is "narrowly tailored to serve a compelling governmental interest. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:47 am
Some clues as to the ITC's rationale were previously provided by the parties' submissions to the United States Trade Representative (USTR).Now it's time for the complete picture. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 3:50 am
Gaona–Gomez admitted he was a Mexican national and was in the United States “without the proper immigration documents. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 11:33 pm
Supreme Court explained in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 11:39 am
By 1975, EPA and OSHA had promulgated regulations that curtailed the use of asbestos, of all types, in the United States. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 12:39 pm
In my previous post I published the dissenting views of Commissioner Pinkert, one of the six chiefs of the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC), from the majority decision granting Samsung (unless vetoed by the United States Trade Representative or reversed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) an exclusion order against older iPhones and iPads. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 9:24 pm
With the recent US Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 8:25 am
Professor Seck has recently been considering ramifications of Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum 569 U. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 6:24 am
., LLC v. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 7:23 am
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenes isolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 10:18 am
In Kiobel, the Supreme Court unanimously affirmed a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dismissing a complaint filed under the ATS. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 9:06 am
Roughly two and a half months later the United States Supreme Court in Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 9:01 am
Co. v. [read post]
