Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court"
Results 8721 - 8740
of 9,064
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2008, 11:28 am
- Arizona lawyer Stephen Follett in his Arizona Estate Planning & Probate Blog DOJ touts increase in counterfeiting prosecutions, stiff sentences - Miami attorney Leora Herrmann of Kluger Peretz Kaplan & Berlin in her Counterfeit Blog Probate and the history of women's inheritance rights - Sarah Hyndman Fitzpatrick of Hull & Hull in the firm's Toronto Estate Law Blog [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 10:05 am
DC Dicta Request for Cert here in Bell v Cone, earlier Supreme Court [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 2:48 am
Supreme Court to overturn a ruling last July by the state Supreme Court, which ruled that a search of Gant's car violated the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, and that the evidence must therefore be thrown out. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 7:55 pm
Arizona v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 2:39 pm
” The state of Arizona contended in its appeal that the Arizona Supreme Court had undercut the Supreme Court’s 1981 decision in New York v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 10:55 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Monday agreed to hear three cases [Order List, PDF], including Arizona v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 8:29 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 7:09 am
Opinion below (Supreme Court of Arizona) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Amicus brief of Los Angeles County (in support of the petitioner) Amicus brief of the National Association of Police Organizations (in support of the petitioner) __________________ Docket: 07-544 Case name: Chrones v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 7:04 am
” The state of Arizona contended in its appeal that the Arizona Supreme Court had undercut the Supreme Court’s 1981 decision in New York v. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 1:21 pm
The question presented is: Did the Arizona Supreme Court effectively "overrule" this Court’s bright-line rule in Belton by requiring in each case that the State prove after the fact that those inherent dangers actually existed at the time of the search? [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 10:50 am
Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 3:27 am
(Oh, did you think Rehnquist was just our former Supreme Court Chief? [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 5:36 am
Arizona was constitutionally required at the time of the Framing, but the Court just didn’t see the true Constitution until the 5-4 decision by Earl Warren in 1966? [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 5:17 am
In a very interesting opinion that covers a lot of very interesting modern criminal justice issues, the Arizona Supreme Court yesterday in Fushek v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 10:16 pm
"Recently, the Arizona Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 7:39 pm
The Arizona Supreme Court ruled that misdemeanor defendants are entitled to jury trials if they could be required to register as sex offenders if convicted. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 6:27 pm
by Associated PressThe Arizona Supreme Court Decision:DALE JOSEPH FUSHEK, v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 4:07 am
" It begins:In Arizona, a state agency surveys people who work in or have had contact with the courts. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 9:43 am
Supreme Court is weighing arguments heard recently in Baze vs. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 9:20 am
Cherry, Justice of the Nevada Supreme Court, Concerning the Order of the Nevada Supreme Court In the Matter of the Review of Issues Concerning Representation of Indigent Defendants in Criminal and Juvenile Delinquency Cases Issued on January 4, 2008, ADKT No. 411 (www.nvsupremecourt.us/documents/orders/ADKT411Order.pdf) IX Public Comment X Discussion of potential topics for future meetings XI. [read post]
