Search for: "HARMS v. HARMS" Results 8721 - 8740 of 36,795
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2020, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
The basic idea is that platforms should improve their systems for reducing online harms. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 1:44 pm
  Though recall that the illegal spraying doesn't harm them (except for the fines) -- it instead harms their neighbors. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 The court concluded that regardless of whether or not the arbitrator erred in finding that Plaintiff's denial of having thrown punches precluded a finding of remorse, the record showing minor injuries to the student, and a separate finding by the arbitrator that Plaintiff's actions put the student at serious risk of harm, supports imposing the penalty of dismissal based on the Plaintiff's use of excessive force.Citing Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union… [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 The court concluded that regardless of whether or not the arbitrator erred in finding that Plaintiff's denial of having thrown punches precluded a finding of remorse, the record showing minor injuries to the student, and a separate finding by the arbitrator that Plaintiff's actions put the student at serious risk of harm, supports imposing the penalty of dismissal based on the Plaintiff's use of excessive force.Citing Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union… [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 5:00 pm by John Jascob
Many industry observers are interested in this very issue, as an announcement of the final resolution in CFTC v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 4:35 pm
  This is a good example, I think, of an opinion that many (perhaps most) panels would elect to leave unpublished.Not much harm in publishing, of course. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 4:04 pm by Patricia Hughes
Persons who violate any of the instructions they are given are subject to 6 months in prison and/or $750,000 in fines; “a person who causes a risk of imminent death or serious bodily harm to another person while wilfully or recklessly contravening this act or the regulations could be liable for a fine of up to $1,000,000 or imprisonment of up to 3 years or both” (Quarantine Act, ss.67(2)). [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:35 am by Schachtman
Expert witness opinions about the nature and cause of plaintiffs’ medical conditions, are the linchpin of mass tort cases involving claims of bodily injury from allegedly harmful products. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 8:15 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
She lost the first time under her Bivens claim, and she loses again under the Federal Tort Claims Act.The case is Doe v. [read post]