Search for: "Low v. Low" Results 8721 - 8740 of 15,558
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2013, 11:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
[v]  (The apparent search for pockets is reflected in the naming of third parties as well. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 2:49 pm by Lowell Brown
” A new HBA Law Day event was a “Day at the Courthouse,” where 45 special-needs students from middle and high schools saw a re-enactment of the Brown v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 3:43 pm by Giles Peaker
Birmingham City Council v Balog [2013] EWCA Civ 1582A s.202 review decision on affordability was at the centre of this second appeal, brought by Birmingham after a s.204 appeal decision went against them. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 3:43 pm by Giles Peaker
Birmingham City Council v Balog [2013] EWCA Civ 1582A s.202 review decision on affordability was at the centre of this second appeal, brought by Birmingham after a s.204 appeal decision went against them. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 2:16 pm
A presumptive risk level of 1 (low risk), 2 (moderate risk), or 3 (high risk) is calculated for an offender by adding up the points assigned to the offender in each category. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 11:27 am by admin
December 13, 2013 In a decision issued earlier this week, Canada’s Competition Tribunal denied a Vancouver tobacco retailer’s price maintenance leave application against manufacturer Imperial Tobacco (“Imperial”) (Safa Enterprises Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 12:03 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Improving the Operation of the Notice and Takedown System Moderator: John Morris, Associate Administrator and Director of Internet Policy, NTIA Voluntary agreement among wireless companies will be announced today re: cellphone unlocking.We will not be talking about fundamental changes to notice and takedown, but instead take 512 as it is and see if there are areas where we can improve its implementation. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 11:52 am by Dan Parlow
The Supreme Court of Canada has opened the door more widely to consumer class actions in a case which follows an Ontario Securities Commission settlement: AIC Limited v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 10:50 pm by Peter Tillers
[snip. snip] "Admission of the birth certificate also would have posed a low risk of confusing or misleading the jury. [read post]