Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE" Results 8721 - 8740 of 42,245
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2017, 6:42 am by John Jascob
NCPPR cited WikiLeaks as evidence that there is collusion between high-level political personnel and national news outlet employees. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 5:30 am by Howard Friedman
 The court ruled, however, that this is a matter of religious doctrine that may not be determined by a civil court. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
 In a separate Opinion in the same matter, Judge Rambo granted the Plaintiff’s proposed method of bifurcation in conjunction with a punitive damages claim. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 11:45 am by David Markus
  When Martinez tried to portray the fisherman as someone who ordered the destruction of evidence, disobeyed a federal officer, and worked out a cover-up scheme, Chief Justice John G. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
"Once it has been determined that there is such a right of access, then the proceeding 'cannot be closed unless specific, on the record findings are made demonstrating that closure is essential to preserve higher values and is narrowly tailored to serve that interest.'" The Appellate Division found that Member failed to submit evidence establishing that, as a matter of law, removal hearings conducted pursuant to Education Law §1709(18) have historically… [read post]
6 May 2013, 11:19 pm by Florian Mueller
Nokia doesn't always side with Apple: it supports Google against the FRAND part of Judge Posner's ruling. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:14 am by Diane Tweedlie
With respect to Article 100(a) EPC, it was argued, inter alia, that the subject-matter of claim 1 of the granted patent lacked novelty with respect to D1 or D2 and that the subject-matter of claim 1 lacked an inventive step with respect to D1 alone or the combination of D1 and D2.VII. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 3:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  It cannot be argued that there is a fourth element in legal malpractice - the "but for" rule - that exists no where else. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 5:36 pm
This rule applies in courts all over Georgia, from Atlanta to Columbus to Macon, and pretty much everywhere else in the nation as well. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:10 am by Chip Merlin
Plaintiff brings no evidence that those investigations were biased or pretextual. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 10:55 am by Sandy T. Fox
What that means is that whenever you go to court on a parental responsibility and timesharing matter – before the judge hears any arguments or any evidence – the court begins the process presuming that equal timesharing is the proper timesharing split and is what is in the best interest of the child. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm by Joel R. Brandes
In Matter of Susko v Susko, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2020 WL 1056323, 2020 N.Y. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 11:17 pm by Marta Requejo
The judgment This is the concise ruling of the ECJ: “The provisions laid down in Article 21 et seq. of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000, do not apply to provisional measures, relating to rights of custody, falling within the scope of Article 20 of that regulation. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 7:01 am by Joy Waltemath
A federal district court in Florida did not clearly err in determining that Eli Lilly failed to establish, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the amount in controversy in a claim by former employees for unpaid incentive pay exceeded $5 million to warrant removing a case from state to federal court under the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA), ruled the Eleventh Circuit. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 2:03 am by Eric S. Solotoff
“Hearsay is inadmissible unless it falls within one or more of the exceptions enumerated in our evidence rules. [read post]