Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 8721 - 8740
of 9,094
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2008, 1:24 pm
Wait a Second reports on the Second Circuit holdings that in a habeas case, the District Court should not have barred the state from trying to retrying the defendant. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
To view these cases distributed by Findlaw.com you must first sign in to Findlaw.com. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 9:12 am
”  The District Court was apparently referring to a general First Amendment right, but that right can be and frequently is contractually waived. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 9:12 am
”  The District Court was apparently referring to a general First Amendment right, but that right can be and frequently is contractually waived. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 10:00 am
First, in rearing the specter of federal intrusion on matters of traditionally state concern, the Court fails to acknowledge the fact that even the SEC actions expressly allowed by PSLRA § 104, with which the Court takes no issue, do the same. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 9:17 pm
Co. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 11:13 am
United States and Gall v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 7:19 pm
[www.floridasupport.us][www.floridasupport.us] NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT MICHAEL MORDENTI, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D05-4407 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) _____________________________________ ) Opinion filed February 22, 2008. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 7:51 am
Arnold District Court Decision: Recoiling Against Romm In United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 1:29 pm
Alas, the First admits that the Supreme Court is likely to decide the issue in United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 6:38 am
In the present case, District of Columbia v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 3:40 pm
Kinetic Concepts, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 11:20 pm
Following the initial lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, summary judgment was entered for Central Bank. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 10:02 am
The court held that the CDA offered immunity only against state law “intellectual property” cl [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:24 am
The ruling comes in US v. [read post]
CA1: the First says that 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) is constitutional, because it isn't a rule of decision
8 Feb 2008, 12:42 pm
" The First then distinguishes United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 11:38 am
The First District Illinois Court of Appeals stated that the standard of review for a Rule 308 appeal is de novo. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 11:44 am
In Hamlin v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 8:23 am
First things first. [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 6:16 am
You can read about here in the Sweetwater library.Supreme Court justices declared and defined the crimes of courts-martial and ATTAINDER committed when "...a legislative act [think Articles of War, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)] inflicts punishment without a judicial TRIAL (Cummings v. [read post]
