Search for: "U.S. Direct Express"
Results 8721 - 8740
of 9,645
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2009, 1:53 pm
., was passed by Congress in 1990 with an express purpose “to provide a clear and comprehensive national mandate for the elimination of discrimination against individuals with disabilities. [read post]
7 May 2021, 3:11 pm
Adler argued that even were such niceties linguistically plausible, Congress and the U.S. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 12:04 pm
In the 1990s, Aetna acquired U.S. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 7:40 am
Forklift Sys., Inc., 510 U.S. 17, 21 (1993). [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 5:55 am
DHS has frequently defined “domestic violent extremist” as a U.S. actor “who seeks to further social or political goals, wholly or in part, through unlawful acts of force or violence. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:58 am
U.S. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 8:41 pm
The SEC had no direct comment on the letter. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:29 pm
The U.S. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 6:05 am
Even U.S. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 10:23 am
Bd. of Regents of the Univ. of the State of N.Y., 385 U.S. 589, 603 (1967). [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 6:54 pm
Action 13-384 (RBW), 2013 U.S. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:55 am
That likely reflects a gratitude rooted in ongoing U.S. support for its independence, despite the pressure the U.S. is exerting, along with the EU, on Kosovo’s leaders to reach an accommodation with Serbia to gain Serbia’s recognition, even as Vučić has said in no uncertain terms he has no plans to do so. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 2:05 am
Anyone in this role has the ability to influence people’s lives, a significant amount of responsibility, and something that you can have a direct impact on your business. [read post]
10 May 2010, 8:53 am
" The U.S. has a two-party system, and Britain did for most of the 19th century, but does not today, as the election returns make clear, and Canada has a four party system. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 6:42 pm
” The Republican legislators, they told the justices, strategically waited to see which map the trial court would approve before going to the U.S. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 11:44 am
Stakeholders and the public just had to swallow whatever bitter vittles the U.S. immigration bureaucracy served up, even though, when the direction of the dishing is reversed and petitioners seek immigration benefits, the agency has expected immaculate hygiene and punctilious compliance with its recipes, i.e., USCIS's spare, ambiguous and outdated regulations. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 10:26 am
Now, it will be up to the three-judge federal panel to decide whether, under the U.S. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:59 pm
Today, the U.S. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 2:10 pm
It must (1) produce decisions that align with and reinforce the rights and freedoms of the U.S. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 9:13 pm
He is right, I confess—I offered no direct evidence to show a problem with the numbers. [read post]
