Search for: "Wells v. Wells"
Results 8721 - 8740
of 97,164
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2016, 1:12 pm
The California Court of Appeal will teach you a whole new set of terminology if you pay attention.You may well already know what "gassing" entails. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 2:27 pm
And making the case final now only necessitates that we pay for either appointed counsel to write a petition for review (if the government wins) or pay the Attorney General to write one (if the defendant wins) -- both of which we know full well will be held pending the outcome of the California Supreme Court's decision.Given all the wasted effort, I might just prefer that we hold the case for now, and then quickly and efficiently dispense with the thing once the Calfornia… [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 10:26 am
So right that it doesn't need oral argument, nor more than a week after the date the case was deemed submitted to publish its opinion.It may well be (and in fact is the case) that, in California state court, when the trial judge grants an anti-SLAPP motion that dismisses the claims against two of three defendants, that order is subject to an immediate appeal. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 3:36 pm
Or, worse, what the jury instructions in such cases should say.Witness this opinion.The majority and the dissent disagree about both what to do in situations like this one as well as what exactly transpired here. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 1:04 pm
I knew that prisons see a fair (or at least surprising) amount of drug trafficking, as well as trafficking in cell phones, cigarettes, etc. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 10:35 am
The stark reality is that the nature of the crimes, as well as the number of children involved, isn't exactly conducive to wanting to reach out and reverse his convictions.Now, the sentence imposed on the guy here -- Michael Pepe -- is an extraordinarily long one: 210 years. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 12:46 pm
And one that resolves the issue both conclusively as well as correctly. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 4:16 pm
Analysis: The Court discussed several principles of statutory construction when the plain language of statutes renders a conflict, including (i) an analysis of the context and legislative history of both statutes, (ii) the precedence of a more recent statute over an earlier statute and (iii) the well-established principle that a more specific enactment governs a more general statute. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:59 am
The arbitrators may well feel like extending the deadline and getting their fees. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 10:14 am
In the prior parallel decision – Enfish v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 6:56 am
Engle v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 7:23 am
., et al. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 12:57 am
It seems Mr Brailsford may well have coined the mark and used it in the USA. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 3:00 pm
But Monday’s argument in POM Wonderful v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
"Kennedy v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 7:30 am
Nosal and WEC Carolina v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 7:21 am
O’Donnell, No. 07-0697, and Marks v. [read post]
1 May 2010, 7:30 pm
In M. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 8:56 am
See Faro v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 9:49 am
Rodriguez v. [read post]
