Search for: "Business Benefits Inc." Results 8741 - 8760 of 9,584
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2017, 5:03 am by Ron Coleman
In re Int’l Flavors & Fragrances Inc., 51 USPQ2d 1513, 1517-18 (Fed. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 8:00 am by Hedge Fund Lawyer
Certainly, the potential benefit of the JOBS Act is that funds, particularly those with less than $1 billion under management, will be able to leverage their capital raising efforts. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm by Steven M. Taber
Landfill gas collected by the separate Middlesex County Utilities Authority (MCUA) and Edgeboro Disposal Inc. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Court reconsidering baseless ‘making available’ theory in file-sharing case Capitol Records v Jammie Thomas; amicus briefs from, MPAA, PFF: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Electronic Fontier Foundation), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Patry Copyright Blog) ICANN approves rules allowing brands to be registered… [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am by Eugene Volokh
Guardianship Estate of Keffeler, which interpreted a statute protecting Social Security benefits from "execution, levy, attachment, garnishment, or other legal process. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 5:07 pm by LindaMBeale
  The fact that Oklahoma Republican Senator James Inhofe--a person who is notorious;y anti-environmental protection,  a climate change denier, and pro Big Business no matter the cost to the environment--support Pruitt assures the American people that Pruitt does not care at all about the potential harms to the environment from  removing our current protective regulations and allowing business to do to the American natural resources th [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 5:07 pm by LindaMBeale
  The fact that Oklahoma Republican Senator James Inhofe--a person who is notorious;y anti-environmental protection,  a climate change denier, and pro Big Business no matter the cost to the environment--support Pruitt assures the American people that Pruitt does not care at all about the potential harms to the environment from  removing our current protective regulations and allowing business to do to the American natural resources th [read post]
Among the difficulties the SEC faces are the following: A historical lack of flexibility in the SEC’s imposition of sanctions, particularly with respect to individuals employed in the securities industry; The limited ability of the SEC to protect would-be cooperators from the risks of collateral consequences that could follow from cooperating, including criminal and other civil exposures; The potential for inconsistency between the admissions that could follow from cooperation and the… [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 8:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
As of July 1, businesses can receive a 3 percent sales tax rate reduction (paid in the form of a refund) for sales taxes paid on purchases of machinery and equipment. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 8:43 am by Chris Castle
”The experience recounted in the report mirrors that of Apple Inc., which has grown increasingly compliant with Beijing in recent years. [read post]
16 Mar 2019, 8:28 am by Eric Goldman
.] ___ Do not let anyone tell you there is not any money to be made in the business of emojis: just ask Kim Kardashian West. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
A business is generally potentially responsible for harms caused by the equipment it uses in the course of business, at least when it negligently fails to take reasonable steps to minimize the risks of those harms. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 2:50 pm by Josh H. Escovedo
After decades of the NCAA reaping the benefit of college players, their labor, and their name, image, and likeness (collectively, NIL), the NCAA has changed its policy and allowed players to market their NIL without sacrificing their amateur status. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the October 26 conference)   AT&T, Inc v. [read post]