Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 8741 - 8760
of 13,916
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2017, 10:36 am
The court summarily affirmed North Carolina v. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 1:04 pm
An 1886 decision (Presser v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 2:18 pm
Polansky v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 5:38 am
LUSTIG v. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 9:02 pm
In Bostock v. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 5:27 pm
In Spirit of the Sage Council, et al. v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 11:49 pm
Duffy indicated that the Supreme Court (where he once clerked) was not as familiar with patent law as it was with administrative law, and therefore, the Court would likely defer to the USPTO with respect to its interpretation of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 4:36 pm
(in support of petitioner) __________________ Docket: 08-6 Title: District Attorney’s Office for the Third Judicial District, et al. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 12:07 pm
Harris plans on Thursday to tour the center with an abortion provider and highlight what the administration has done to try to preserve access to the procedure as conservative states enact growing restrictions.Minnesota has become a haven for abortion seekers since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
24 Aug 2006, 7:18 am
A Prawfs public service announcement--over at the Law Librarian Blog, Joe Hodnicki writes:When the Supreme Court of the United States decided in Hamdan v. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 9:03 pm
Supreme Court antitrust decision. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 12:00 am
The decision in NKT Cables A/S v. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 4:55 pm
In Molina v. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 9:59 am
For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court insofar as it upheld the hearing officer's determination regarding the extent of the School District's violation of the DEA, but REVERSE the court's affirmation of the compensatory-education award and REMAND the case with instructions to have the appropriate administrative body craft a remedy that complies with the IDEA. 07a0088p.06 2007/03/02 USA v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 2:25 am
The Law Offices of Keith L. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 2:25 am
The Law Offices of Keith L. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 7:58 am
In NERA v. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 8:17 am
In 2006 in Hamden v Rumsfeld, the Supreme Court ruled against the Bush administration in their plans to hold military commission trials for Guantanamo Bay detainees. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 12:30 pm
” Hobgood noted that the Supreme Court decisions cited by Cline’s attorneys regarding the First Amendment protections for public officials explicitly carved out an exception: that, as Garrison v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 6:29 am
Howard Wasserman analyzes the Court’s recent decision in Krupski v. [read post]
