Search for: "ROBERTS V. UNITED STATES " Results 8741 - 8760 of 9,856
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2021, 4:15 pm by Josh Blackman
And Justice Roberts' so-called "switch" occurred in West Coast Hotel, which involved a state law, rather than a federal law. [read post]
5 May 2020, 11:40 am by sydniemery
United States: CSLI, Third-Party Doctrine, and Privacy in the Twenty-first Century 14 Liberty U. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 12:51 pm by Amy Howe
Frederick for respondents (Art Lien) Roberts was perhaps Frederick’s toughest questioner. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 11:50 am by David Debold
United States threatened to have a dangerous chilling effect on the everyday functioning of our democratic system. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 10:46 am
House of Representatives voted to overturn the D.C. gun ban in 2004 and again in 2005.Then, last March, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia overturned the ban, giving gun rights advocates a major victory in their long battle over the restrictions.The ruling drew strong reaction from both sides of the gun control issue. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 3:11 pm by lawmrh
United States, 249 U.S. 47, 52 (1919), “[T]he character of every act depends upon the circumstances in which it is done. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 11:20 am by Gregory Forman
United States Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson’s wry if not cynical observation, concurring in Brown v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 10:48 am
United States, 250 U.S. 616 (1919). [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 5:12 am by SHG
Article II, Section 2, of the Constitution states: [The President] shall have Power to Grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 7:51 pm by Samuel Bray
United States, in which the majority opinion of Chief Justice Roberts is pervaded by an argument that the statute, read in the context from which it arose, was "about" something. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 5:16 am by Guest Blogger
He calls the majority’s decision "indefensible," and describes the proceedings as following "a course more fitting a kangaroo court than a court of the United States. [read post]