Search for: "STATE v. SMALL"
Results 8741 - 8760
of 16,894
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2016, 5:02 pm
” (Citing Muzzy Ranch Co. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 5:01 am
As Paul Larkin pointed out in Armour v. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 12:52 pm
See State v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 7:33 am
United States, in which the state sought compensation for the temporary flooding on a game management area due to a dam. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 11:22 am
See, e.g., Blockowicz v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 6:51 am
The case was Cvent v. [read post]
24 Jul 2006, 3:48 am
(Gonzales v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 6:51 am
The case was Cvent v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 2:05 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:59 pm
Wolfe’s Borough Coffee, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (“Starbucks V”) concluding that Starbucks failed to prove that the defendant’s use of the marks MISTER CHARBUCKS and CHARBUCKS BLEND is likely to dilute Starbucks’s famous marks including, of course, STARBUCKS. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 6:05 pm
A small win? [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
Pa.) and Properties of the Villages, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm
Solo v. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 1:48 pm
Felten v. [read post]
19 Sep 2009, 12:55 am
And now, in United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 12:00 am
McIntyre Mach. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2006, 10:47 am
Bell v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 11:18 am
Finally, Naksone writes that “[v]iolent extremist organizations have used the Internet to recruit terrorists, raise funds, direct violent attacks, and disseminate gruesome propaganda. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 7:29 pm
We distinguish the authority of Brown v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 8:02 am
This essay explores the possible dual readings of AT&T v. [read post]
