Search for: "State v. Lively" Results 8741 - 8760 of 28,987
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2008, 10:34 pm
What about a living constitution argument for Heller? [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 1:00 pm
The United States, of course, should live up to its treaty commitments. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 5:15 am
Balkin and Sanford LevinsonDred Scott v. [read post]
Separating the lives of two people, particularly after a number of years spent together can be extremely complex. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 2:31 pm by Matthew Streb
The Supreme Court’s decision in Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 11:00 am by Unknown
(Americas Migration Brief, June 2023) [text]Case in Brief: Canadian Council for Refugees v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 3:23 am by Sophie Corke
The IP Watchdog gave an overview of the relevant principles non-profit organisations should bear in mind to avoid consumer confusion.The Kluwer Trademark Blog discussed whether descriptive terms in languages which do not hold official EU language status might still be deemed to give rise to a likelihood of confusion where there is nevertheless a significant population in at least one EU Member State which speaks that language - whether that is Russian in Germany or the Baltic… [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
Morgan Kousser, and Orville Vernon Burton in Nairne v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 11:00 pm
”Given those discrepancies, the appellate court concluded that Corrections lacked a bonafide basis to withhold the requested footage and remitted the matter to the Albany County Supreme Court for a determination as to the fees and costs awardable to PLS, given its prevailing party status here.Looks like that FOIL foolishness got flogged.# # #Matter of Prisoners' Legal Servs. of N.Y. v New York State Dept. of Corr. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 3:34 pm by David Greene
Of course not, and that’s why EFF filed an amicus brief in Lafayette City v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 1:08 am by Darius Whelan
 Background You may also be aware that The Programme for Government stated: “People of non-faith or minority religious backgrounds and publicly identified LGBT people should not be deterred from training or taking up employment as teachers in the State”. [read post]