Search for: "State v. Word"
Results 8741 - 8760
of 40,667
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2018, 5:13 am
The selection must also have a technical effect, or in other words, be another invention. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 2:02 pm
In Garcia v. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 3:45 pm
See United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 8:22 am
The Supreme Court recently refused to hear Baston v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 9:58 pm
In 1992, the Supreme Court of the United States heard a case called Quill v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 3:43 am
Justice Kennedy’s words ring hollow that the state’s website does not provide the public with means to shame the offender when considering the evidence in this case. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 3:18 am
This is because there is a widespread practice among EU member states of awarding taxpayers simple interest on the recovery of taxes which were unduly paid and thus if the CJEU were seeking to outlaw that practice, it would be reasonable to expect clear words to that effect. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 9:08 am
Bank v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 9:04 am
., fighting words, solicitation). [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 10:13 pm
Alfonso, 759 F.2d at 736; United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:57 am
That was State v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:52 am
[vi] If an individual is going to err deciding the layoff rights of an employee, it is likely to involve some confusion of status involving the three “P” words: permanent, probationer and provisional. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 12:02 pm
In other words, if the defendants choose to leave a complaint unanswered, the court may deem the well-pled allegations of the plaintiff to have been admitted by the defendants due to their failure to deny them. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 4:07 am
Qurate Retail, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2021, 12:49 pm
Dunn won in State v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 4:23 pm
Additionally, the Empire Series is set in New York, the Empire State. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am
The scope of the rules on concealed fraud were reviewed in the Report of the Law Revision Committee of 1934, following which the Limitation Act 1939 (“LA 1939”), s 26 introduced express wording on the “postponement of limitation period in case of fraud or mistake”. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:52 pm
In Hamilton v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:04 am
On 19 October 2011, the Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson) released its decision in the joined cases of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2011] UKSC 47. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:04 am
On 19 October 2011, the Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson) released its decision in the joined cases of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2011] UKSC 47. [read post]
