Search for: "Still v. Justice Court" Results 8741 - 8760 of 19,629
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2012, 10:44 pm
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice denied his claim, and he appealed to the Court of Appeal.The Court of Appeal held that public policy did not prohibit someone who was not criminally responsible by reason of a mental disorder from recovering the insurance proceeds on the life of the person he killed. [read post]
22 May 2016, 6:06 pm by Justin A
" I'm still confused, but I like the result the Court arrived at--closing a loophole. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 9:47 am by Stephen Wermiel
In 2012, the Justices were exercising their power to interpret the meaning of the Constitution, but in the new case, King v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 3:59 am by Russ Bensing
  In other places, they cite the Ohio Supreme Court’s 2003 decision in Klein v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the court released orders from Friday’s conference, adding one case to its merits docket for next term, Jones v. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 4:53 am by SHG
The nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court doesn’t spell the death of Roe v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 12:00 pm by Florian Mueller
I still stand by that assessment, with one modification: Google actually got a better deal than Apple. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 4:04 am
This case is a good example, and Justice Simons's opinion collects and reflects the various cases that hold that even, as here, when the judgment hasn't even been entered yet we're still unwilling to tinker with it in light of things we now know to be true. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 4:14 pm by Bona Law PC
Dep’t of Justice, Criminal Div., Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs (June 2020); DOJ updated Justice Manual. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 9:57 am by CMS
The Court also held that there was no basis for referral to the Court of Justice of the European Union, as the relevant provisions of EU law were beyond serious argument. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 12:02 pm
Article 17 of the Directive allows Member States to determine “the extent to which, and the conditions under which, such a [copyright] protection is conferred, including the level of originality required” [See the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in case C-168/09 - Flos SpA v Semeraro Casa e Famiglia SpA , for a discussion of the scope of Article 17]. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 5:04 am by Kiel Brennan-Marquez
For a concrete example of what I have in mind, consider Yates v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:06 pm
Tosshan Ramgolam reports on our own Kat Eleonora Rosati holding the official book launch for her new book, Copyright and the Court of Justice of the European Union. [read post]