Search for: "United States v. Close"
Results 8741 - 8760
of 14,200
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2009, 6:33 am
Obama Chooses Sotomayor for Supreme Court Nominee [The Caucus / New York Times] The Dynamic of the Nomination of Sonia Sotomayor [SCOTUSblog] Sonia Sotomayor [Wikipedia] On a Supreme Court Prospect's Résumé: 'Baseball Savior' [New York Times] Related: United States Supreme Court - Supreme Court - United States - Senate - Government [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 12:55 pm
As one might expect with tax statutes, there are lots of defined terms so when we say “American” we really mean a “specified United States person”. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 3:00 pm
Howell of the United States District Court for The District of Columbia issued an order, in CREW v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 5:30 am
In United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 2:57 pm
United v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 11:59 am
Filing of the new brief, in Al-Marri v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 7:06 am
—Feds Eye Social Media for Securities Shenanigans http://goo.gl/ExgYY Tech Summit 2013 Recap – Innovation in Outsourcing http://goo.gl/RpyyM Entitlement Matters http://goo.gl/ch1Zw Heartache and Sour Grapes on the Internet: A Lesson in Case Management http://goo.gl/P4M3n Beyond Knowledge and Consciousness – The Development of Liability for Misuse of Trade Secrets in the UK http://goo.gl/wudVt CIPO releases examination guidelines for medical use inventions http://goo.gl/cpXjW Knock… [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 6:45 pm
The mother then brought Marisol and Silvia to the United States. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 7:38 am
An explicit statement that courts’ regulating their own procedure was a proper judicial function came a few days later, in Bank of the United States v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 10:06 am
Boyd v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 7:19 am
” At Concurring Opinions, Daniel Solove discusses United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm
United States In South Carolina the case of Charleston City Paper has confirmed libel law principles, Blog Law Online comments. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am
This is an undesirable state of affairs for the reasons given at paragraph 6 of my earlier Memorandum. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:51 am
US, No. 2007-1220 19 C.F.R. section 181.53, a deferred duty regulation, does not violate the Export Clause, or Article I, Section 9, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 12:37 pm
Hein v. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 7:32 am
The court rescheduled this case 10 times before finally relisting it after the April 1 conference, so at least one of the justices has been paying very close attention to the matter. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
The plaintiffs emphasize the long history of Virginia mandating disclosure of race as a means of enforcing the state’s anti-miscegenation laws prior to the Supreme Court’s 1967 decision in Loving v. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 12:19 pm
In the meantime the discussion merits close analysis by defense counsel hoping to find ground for an early dismissal. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 2:43 pm
This week my most popular blog post in a long time brought to light the fact that the United States Patent and Trademark Office now believes one of Apple's iPhone design patents underlying the bulk of a $540 million judgment against Samsung shouldn't have been granted in the first place since it merely combined existing design elements.In that post I expressed hopes that Samsung would take the design patent issues in that case to the Supreme Court, and a filing made… [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 6:30 am
The government might seek to introduce testimony from officials with knowledge of the United States’ dealings with Al Qaeda before 9/11. [read post]
