Search for: "United States v. Grant" Results 8741 - 8760 of 25,399
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The United States Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently affirmed a lower court’s decision against an Indiana man who lost his foot in a crane accident. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 4:08 am by Stephen Page
25 March 2010, more than 50 judges and other experts from Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, France, Egypt, Germany, India, Mexico, New Zealand, Pakistan, Spain, United Kingdom and the United States of America, including experts from the Hague Conference on Private International Law and the International Centre for Missing and Exploited Children, met in Washington, D.C. to discuss cross? [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 10:00 am by Scott Hervey
On September 30, 2021, the United State Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit decided a much-anticipated copyright reversion case involving the slasher franchise, Friday the 13th. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 5:09 am by Sheppard Mullin
On June 25, 2010, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ("TTAB") of the United States Patent and Trademark Office rendered its decision in the case of Valentino U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 11:49 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
., (collectively,“Apotex”) appeal from a final judgment enteredagainst them by the United States District Court for theSouthern District of New York. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 6:11 am
United States, 440 U.S. 147, 153-54 (1979)).As to factor 1, there was no genuine dispute that the "key issue" in this proceeding is identical to one of the issues decided in the civil action: ownership. [read post]
Case date: 22 October 2024 Case number: No. 23-16060 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law More from our authors: Trade Mark Law in Europe: Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Fourth Edition by Ulrich Hildebrandt€ 176 Concise European Design Law … [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 3:42 pm
Opinion below (2nd Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Amicus brief of the United States (in support of the petitioners) Amicus brief of Hayward D. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
 Citing Guggenheimer v Ginzburg, 43 NY2d 268, the court further ruled that Supreme Court had  also properly granted that branch of the employee organization’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s amended complaint seeking to recover damages for discrimination "for failure to state a cause of action pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7). [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 8:04 am
" The United States brief ultimately recommends that the Supreme Court not grant certiorari for two reasons. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 12:00 pm by The Public Employment Law Press
The resolution added a new paragraph to Rule 72.1 designating the Authorities Budget Office as a separate unit for suspension, demotion or displacement within the Department of State. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 2:40 pm
With the caveat that I'm not an attorney, here's my Cliff Notes version on the June 26, 2013, United States Supreme Court ruling in U.S. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 5:28 pm by Robert J. McKennon
The federal courts have for a long time struggled with how to apply the deferential standard of review to actions taken by ERISA plan administrators in light of the United States Supreme Court holding in Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]