Search for: "HARMS v. HARMS" Results 8761 - 8780 of 36,795
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2020, 2:05 am by INFORRM
Left undelineated, the concept of harm is infinitely malleable. [read post]
26 May 2020, 8:53 am by Eugene Volokh
But if Smith were overruled, this Court's estimate of harm would have been final, unrevisable without an Article V constitutional amendment. [3.] [read post]
26 May 2020, 6:22 am by Schachtman
Studies funded by parties are routinely relied upon in litigation, and they are often pivotal in how courts decide significant claims of environmental or occupational harm.[1] Unfortunately, the sponsorship of studies by plaintiffs’ counsel, third-party litigation funding entities, and advocacy groups is often obscured or hidden. * * * * * * * * * * * * I recently happened upon an article of interest in an obscure journal, by a well-known author.[2]  The author, John C. [read post]
25 May 2020, 1:14 pm by STEPHEN HOLZER
     The lawsuit does not cite any actual harm that has so far occurred due to EPA's change in policy but argues only that all kinds of harm are threatened. [read post]
25 May 2020, 12:46 pm
On both substantive and technical grounds, as policy or law, the draft Treaty effectively impedes the development of effective measures for the vindication of the rights of people harmed by others in the course of economic activities.Lamentably, none of these substantial observations, delivered to those who have tasked themselves with this project, was acknowledged. [read post]