Search for: "Mark"
Results 8761 - 8780
of 151,849
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2015, 3:55 am
" Moreover, in the cited registration the mark is translated as "perfect face. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 2:59 am
However, the Board must evaluate the mark EARNHARDT COLLECTION as a whole. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 3:59 am
The Board was not impressed.The Board observed that the fact that a drawing of a mark is two-dimensional does not preclude the alleged mark from being functional. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:02 am
That thought process is too complicated to detract from the inherent or conceptual strength of the mark. [read post]
6 May 2014, 2:00 am
Not surprisingly, the Board found the involved marks to be similar. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 5:17 am
But the Board "properly considered both GO’s uses and third-party uses when assessing how the public would likely perceive the mark. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 12:12 am
Ultimately, distinctiveness of a trade mark is to be determined on the ability of the trade mark to allow the relevant public to distinguish the product in question from those of other undertakings. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 3:41 am
However, as long as the Board considers the mark as a whole, it may give more or less weight to a part of the mark. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 4:06 am
Ltd of Guangzhou, Cancellation No. 92054959 [Petition to cancel a registration for the mark shown below [transliteration: WANG LAO JI] for "processed tea leaves packaged in bags," on the ground of fraud in that a Section 8 Declaration of Use for said registration was fraudulently signed by one Kevin Whang as "Owner" of the mark when he was neither owner of the mark or authorized to practice before the USPTO].March 18, 2014 - 2 PM: Anheuser-Busch Incorporated v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 12:47 pm
These rights are to be able to stop identical and confusingly similar marks. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 1:30 am
DBA Academy of Lactation Policy and Practice, Serial No. 77938432 [Refusal to register CLC as a certification mark for lactation consulting services on the ground that the mark, as used on the specimen of record, designates a title or degree and does not function as a certification mark].June 25, 2013 - 2 PM: In re Universal Scientific Industrial Co., Ltd., Serial Nos. 85111035 and 85076805 [Section 2(d) refusal to register HSIP in stylized form, in view of the registered… [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 6:32 am
The marks have been registered in OHIM, but not in the US (inter alia “ornamental refusal”) or in China (“the mark is likely to produce undesirable social consequence”!). [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 4:04 am
A Morehouse defense requires that the prior registration be for the same mark and the same services as the mark in the challenged registration. [read post]
8 May 2013, 12:35 pm
IR designating the EC No 940490The Tribunale also declared Gucci Flora-related trade marks (national trade mark no 971291, and Community trade marks nn 4462735 and 5172218) invalid [incidentally this Kat has always loved the Flora print, which Gucci created for Grace Kelly during the 1960s]. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 3:21 am
Appellant Hage-Boutros, appearing pro se, contended that the Board improperly dissected his mark instead of considering the involved marks in their entireties. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 4:22 am
The Board affirmed a bifusal of the mark BOCCA DOLCE for "chocolate confections," upholding the USPTO's requirement of a disclaimer of DOLCE and finding a likelihood of confusion with the registered mark BOCCA for "caramels in the nature of candy, chocolates. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 3:29 am
As to commercial strength, Pharmavite did not provide any evidence of use of similar marks for similar goods. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 3:20 am
The Board found the mark likely to cause confusion with the registered marks LION and LION CAPITAL for (in part) identical financial services. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 3:29 am
Do you think the marks are confusingly similar? [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:01 am
Bertini submitted examples of websites that display the APPLE mark in connection with other terms, websites that display other marks owned by Apple, Inc., and websites that do not display the APPLE mark. [read post]
