Search for: "Pass v. State"
Results 8761 - 8780
of 28,443
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2016, 5:21 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
6 May 2015, 5:03 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 3:07 am
Kende responds as follows: [I]n the Fisher v. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 4:21 pm
Constitution's Article 1 Section 9, C.3 states: 'No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed,' and Section 10 says: 'No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law. . . .' The 'words and the intent' of the Ex… [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 6:37 am
For example, the New York City Council passed a measure that subjects the use of automated decision-making tools to several requirements. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 7:30 pm
In Fredericks v. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 12:22 pm
In a decision that spoke somewhat tentatively about an “evolving understanding of the meaning of equality,” the Court in United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 7:00 am
Construction Employees v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 9:48 am
Wang v. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 12:09 pm
Wyden has already candidly admitted that the Worst of Both Worlds FOSTA will pass the Senate, so our only realistic remaining move is trying to fix it. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 8:04 am
” Brown v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 4:00 am
DETLOR v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 6:39 pm
See United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 1:37 pm
The flip side is rarer, where expert testimony that passes Daubertmight still fail because it is not sufficiently certain for state law. [read post]
26 Dec 2015, 9:39 am
Gilberto ValleUnited States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 6:39 pm
See United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 1:08 am
Eschenasy v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 8:13 am
Groff Construction, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:16 am
Delaware Valley Floral Group v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 9:42 pm
While the Maryland Department of Environment processed its permit (and just four days after settlement), a new Harford County Council passed a resolution to remove the property from its plan. [read post]
