Search for: "President v. State" Results 8761 - 8780 of 21,222
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2007, 8:33 am
Not to be outdone, Francis' rival Charles V fought hand to hand in front of the walls of Tunis and had several horses killed under him....By contrast Charles' prudent son Philip II preferred to direct the far-flung campaigns by bureaucratic methods, relying on field commanders whom he selected from the highest nobility and surrounded with closely worded letters of instruction. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 12:35 am
- Chicago attorney Jonathan Rosenfeld on Strellis & Field's Chicago Nursing Home Lawyer Blog Jones Day v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 6:35 am by Beth Graham
  In addition, the Supreme Court’s recent holding in American Express v. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 11:25 am by Sabrina I. Pacifici
OPM Plum Book: Every four years, just after the Presidential election, the “United States Government Policy and Supporting Positions” is published. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 1:01 am
That is what Justice Scalia had to say in dissent earlier this month in Boumediene v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 7:18 am by LexBlog
Jeannie Fox, President of the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities gave a keynote speech during the Forum focusing on solar issues in New Jersey. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 3:55 am
Union activity not a shield for an employee the appointing authority decides not to retain for bona fide reasons Kunjbehari v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 4:15 pm by Larry Munn
Informing this reversal was the additional affidavit evidence from one of Continental Teves’ vice presidents, stating that the company employs a substantial number of engineers in the production of the wares in question and had done so for decades. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 3:12 pm
Like Jeralyn, mcjoan has a good analysis of the just released Al Haramein v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 8:23 am
” The brief counters that the ruling “overlooks the nearly 20-year-old declaration by the United States Congress and the president of the United States that the racially selective detention of Japanese aliens during World War II was a ‘fundamental injustice’ warranting an apology and the payment of reparations. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 1:16 pm by michael
My last post pointed to a Columbus Bar Association press release about Columbus Bar Assn. v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 3:26 am by David Smith
The intent and purpose of the 1999 Order was set out effectively in R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Another, Ex Parte Spath Holme Limited which was referred to in the instant case. [read post]
13 May 2010, 3:26 am by David Smith
The intent and purpose of the 1999 Order was set out effectively in R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Another, Ex Parte Spath Holme Limited which was referred to in the instant case. [read post]