Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 8761 - 8780
of 9,094
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2008, 3:45 pm
Dayton filed this action against the Commission in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio under 42 U.S.C. 1983, seeking a permanent injunction against the state proceedings on the ground that any investigation of Dayton's hiring process or any imposition of sanctions for Dayton's nonrenewal or termination decisions would violate [477 U.S. 619, 625] the Religion Clauses of the First Amendment. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 9:51 am
Eighth Judicial District Court (Mosley), 160 P.3d 873 (2007), the Court held that the State is not required to instruct a grand jury on the concept of self defense. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 5:17 am
., 292 F.3d 1124 (reversing 762-page district court order granting defendants' motion for summary judgment).Characterizing 2.0 as an individualized causation doctrine may at first blush seem unscientific -and it actually is. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 11:54 am
The First has its first opportunity to address Kimbrough v. [read post]
22 Dec 2007, 9:32 am
In a closely watched and important case, the Florida Supreme Court issued its opinion in Chames v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 11:54 am
US v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 5:27 am
Second, I am a little confused by the statement that "Panel determined that a disciplinary proceeding is not the proper forum for a declaration that a rule [Rule 83-1.5 of the Civil Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Utah] is unconstitutional. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 12:47 pm
The Court's 1996 ruling in People v. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 9:00 am
In Street Vendor Project v. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 7:22 pm
Plaintiffs brought their suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio on the basis of diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 6:37 pm
Here, Andyarujina recalls a quarter-century old precedent for this episode: in Sudipt Mazumdar v. [read post]
9 Dec 2007, 3:40 pm
Kennedy, Jr., in District Court in Washington in the case of Abdah, et al., v. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 6:30 pm
S. 303 (1980), the District Court held that the subject matter covered by § 101 clearly includes plant life.... [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 11:40 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, a different reader emails:(1) Even with their July 2007 pay raise (the first in some time), Missouri Supreme Court judges are paid substantially less than US district court judges ($133,043 v. $165,200) [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 5:33 am
The First Circuit heard oral argument on Wednesday in the matter of Boston Gas v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 11:20 am
For example, there is a federal case named Henderson v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
State of California (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1108; see People v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 11:11 pm
United States,1 a recent case decided in the district court of our very own Eastern District of Michigan, raises this issue. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 1:00 am
The Court noted several reasons why a different constitutional analysis was required at Guantanamo than in Johnson v. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 1:43 pm
The parties relied on state law and the district court's case-management authority. [read post]
