Search for: "State v. Law"
Results 8761 - 8780
of 155,404
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2018, 7:36 am
In Useinov v Netherlands [2006] ECHR 1213 the asylum-seeking applicant was allowed to live in the Netherlands while his case was pending for more than five years and the ECtHR found that it was not possible to equate his situation with a lawful stay where the authorities grant an alien permission to settle in their country. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:18 am
Trump appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 7:54 pm
It states: “[N]or shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law[.] [read post]
10 May 2007, 1:04 am
Supreme Court handed down Everson v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 3:35 pm
Last week, Merv Riepe, a Republican State Senator in Nebraska cast the vote that blocked the passage… Continue reading The post Party v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 11:36 am
I previously blogged about White v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 12:00 am
Introduction Elite Construction Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 8:36 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 6:49 am
Static Control Components, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 4:15 am
Charter schools were authorized by a law enacted in 1998 [Chapter 4, Laws of 1998] and in 2005 a bill authorizing the Comptroller to audit Charter Schools was enacted into law [Chapter 267, Laws of 2005].Supreme Court agreed with the Association that General Municipal Law §33(2) and Education Law §2854(1)(c), to the extent that they authorized the Comptroller to audit charter schools, violated Article V of the… [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 10:28 am
The New York State Court of Appeals’ recent decision in Matter of Michael D’Angelo v Nicholas Scoppetta serves as an important reminder that the term “reprimand” may be interpreted more broadly than public employers anticipate. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 10:28 am
The New York State Court of Appeals’ recent decision in Matter of Michael D’Angelo v Nicholas Scoppetta serves as an important reminder that the term “reprimand” may be interpreted more broadly than public employers anticipate. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 9:00 am
Dec. 21, 2018) (granting motion to dismiss common law trespass claim because State lacked exclusive possession over the land). [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:26 am
Lesley Wexler (University of Illinois College of Law) has posted Litigating the Long War on Terror: The Role of Al-Aulaqi v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 1:30 pm
Stanford Law student Ruthie Zemel offers this brief preview of Tuesday’s argument in Giles v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:47 pm
Article 300A of the Constitution of India, 1950, states that individuals cannot be deprived of their property unless authorised by law. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 8:10 am
Therefore, Meachum believed the directive “was given the effect of a new law or new agency rule, despite no new legislation, regulation or even state agency policy. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 5:08 am
In State v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 4:30 am
Mireles v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 8:15 am
S.954: A bill to provide grants to State, local, territorial, and Tribal law enforcement agencies to purchase chemical screening devices and train personnel to use chemical screening devices in order to enhance law enforcement efficiency and protect law enforcement officers. [read post]
