Search for: "United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit" Results 8761 - 8780 of 10,466
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2012, 7:05 pm by Lyle Denniston
” The filing did accept (and noted that the State Department, too, had accepted) that a right to sue had been properly recognized by the Second Circuit Court in 1980, in the case of Filartiga v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 5:54 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Bolstering the chances of gaining review, the petition noted that all 12 of the regular federal appeals courts had repeatedly addressed the issue, and that the Supreme Court itself had granted review of the issue in 2007, but that case washed out before the Court could hear it. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 2:08 am by Florian Mueller
Here's a short follow-up to my take on Epic's opening brief in its Ninth Circuit appeal of Apple's App Store antitrust acquittal. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 1:57 pm by Thomas Merrill
  The primary purpose of the language, as the court of appeals held, is to make clear that Louisiana is entitled to get at least 3,000 cubic feet per second at the Arkansas-Louisiana border. [read post]
23 May 2010, 8:41 pm by cdw
Appellant now purports to appeal the trial court’s order on his motion. [read post]
21 May 2012, 2:09 pm by Jason Mueller
  Second Circuit Opinion On appeal, the Second Circuit interpreted § 512(c), confirmed the District Court correctly concluded that the § 512(c) safe harbor requires knowledge or awareness of specific infringing activity, but held that summary judgment in favor of YouTube was premature because a reasonable juror could find that YouTube had actual knowledge or awareness of specific infringing activity on its website. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 10:05 am
Ziegler (2007), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit acknowledged that an employee has a right to privacy in his workplace computer. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 10:20 am by Abbott & Kindermann
.), the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) violated the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”) and the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”) in adopting the 2006 amendments to the BLM’s grazing regulations.BLM is the federal agency charged with overseeing livestock grazing on over 160 million acres of public land in the western United States. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:13 am by Jeff Gamso
After a series of conflicting rulings from various state and federal courts, Smith won in the Sixth Circuit and Michigan appealed. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 6:37 pm
Readers are requested to notify the Reporter ofDecisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. [read post]
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal in an action for writ of administrative mandate. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 1:39 pm
(…) The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed. [read post]
23 May 2018, 12:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
I suspect that, if the case is appealed, the Second Circuit will agree with the district court's decision here, though it's hard to know for sure. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:34 am by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit disagreed; in its view, the state law only regulates what kind of animals – those that can walk – can be slaughtered without regulating the slaughtering process itself. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 8:09 am by Lyle Denniston
   The Obama Administration urged the Court to deny review, arguing that it was premature for the Court to get involved before other federal appeals courts have ruled on such state attempts to adopt similar laws. [read post]