Search for: "United States v. House"
Results 8761 - 8780
of 12,031
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2016, 12:20 pm
In evaluating the possession challenge, the court noted that possession may be actual or constructive (State v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9 See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R Co… [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
" No, said the California Supreme Court: [W]e are not persuaded that imposing a duty on landlords to withhold rental units from those they believe to be gang members is a fair or workable solution to [the] problem [of gang violence], or one consistent with our state's public policy as a whole. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 9:01 pm
In Roberts v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 9:28 am
See also Golden Door (declining to apply §201(c)(2) but finding ethical violations); United Realty Advisors, LP v. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 8:52 am
Biden, the Court upheld Roger Severino’s removal from the Council that supervises the Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS). [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am
At the Second Thoughts Blog from the Duke Center for Firearms Law, Daniel Rice examines the court’s “void for vagueness” doctrine and how it might relate to the Second Amendment, drawing on Justice Clarence Thomas’ concurrence in United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 7:13 pm
In United States Trust Company of New York v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 10:36 am
Supreme Court rebuke of the White House received an execution date Monday. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 4:13 pm
The ICO ruled in July that the Cabinet Office should hand over copies of the Clearing House’s lists of journalists and the advice given out by the unit to other departments. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
(United States v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 1:07 pm
The dispute concerns the meaning of the statutory phrase “currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:04 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 10:18 am
In United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Cir. 2019); United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 12:01 pm
” United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 11:35 am
I will now take the opportunity to offer a very brief comparison between the Dutch case and the treatment of the attribution issue by the European Court of Human Rights in Al-Jedda v United Kingdom (GC). [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 9:44 am
In relation to the new discretionary ground, I cannot add to what Andrew Arden QC and Caroline Hunter said in their editorial on the subject in the Journal of Housing Law last year (see [2011] JHL 115) and do not intend to do so. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 9:44 am
In relation to the new discretionary ground, I cannot add to what Andrew Arden QC and Caroline Hunter said in their editorial on the subject in the Journal of Housing Law last year (see [2011] JHL 115) and do not intend to do so. [read post]
