Search for: "United States v. John" Results 8761 - 8780 of 11,600
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2011, 7:21 pm by Big Tent Democrat
He is Commander-in-chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the militia of the several States when called into the actual service of the United States. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The committee has included an understanding in the resolution of advice and consent that addresses this point (see section V below). [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:40 pm by John Elwood
United States, 09-11328, and Smith v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:28 am by Graeme Hall
Ruhul ANAM v the United Kingdom – 21783/08 [2011] ECHR 940 (7 June 2011): Bangladeshi with series of criminal convictions fails to halt deportation in European Court of Human Rights on family life grounds. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:49 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: Political process theory, closely associated with the work of John Hart Ely and footnote four in United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:39 am by James Bickford
  And John Elwood of the Volokh Conspiracy and this blog provides an update on a case considered at last week’s Conference, United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 2:23 pm by Richard Posner
  Fifth, there is a sense that politicians the world over, notably including the United States, are preoccupied with the very near term and are simply postponing the day of reckoning with the world’s economic problems that grew out of the financial crisis of September 2008 and the ensuing global economic crisis, which is still with us. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 12:52 pm by John Elwood
(John Elwood) The government’s February 2010 cert. petition in United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 5:12 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, and John V. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:08 pm by Miriam Baer
United States, a well watched case that had raised the question as to whether the exclusionary rule should apply in situations where the police have relied in good faith on law that was later overturned. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 7:31 am by Reproductive Rights
New Hampshire's prior attempt at a parental notification bill was addressed by the United States Supreme Court in Ayotte v. [read post]