Search for: "Bush v. United States" Results 861 - 880 of 2,334
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2020, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
At Top of the Ninth, Merle Kahn breaks down Tuesday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 3:01 am
The ICJ further found that the appropriate reparation would consist of providing, by means of the United States' own choosing, review and reconsideration of the convictions and sentences of the Mexican nationals that were the subject of the case.In the domestic implementation stage of that decision, a 2005 memorandum by President Bush asserted the power to order state courts to provide review and reconsideration of the Mexican nationals' judgments in… [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:54 am by Suzanne Ito
Khaled El-Masri's illegal rendition, detention and torture will continue to haunt the United States until the right thing is done and justice is served at home, not just abroad. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 1:49 am
Bush (2004), that these petitioners are in a fundamentally different position from those in Eisentrager, that their access to the writ is consistent with the historical reach of the writ at common law, and that they are confined within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States? [read post]
24 Apr 2025, 8:31 pm by Guest Author
The First Bank of the United States, championed by Hamilton and approved by Washington, likewise operated with meaningful independence from direct presidential control. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 6:33 am by Erin Miller
Bush will be extended to detainees at the U.S.'s Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 7:30 am by Kelly Goles
He issued 41 rulings between 1951 and 1962 in litigation known as Bush v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 7:54 am by Anna Christensen
  The blogosphere reported yesterday that Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont, has condemned the ruling as the Court’s most partisan since 2000’s Bush v. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 7:56 pm by David Super
  Even if Democrats keep the Senate and retake the House, does anyone seriously believe they would unite behind a plan to sideline the state legislatures (we have certainly seen Democrats refuse to back controversial procedural changes). [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 9:20 pm
Not Prosecutors in Virginia.In the State Of Virginia's relentless pursuit to execute a retarded man (See, Atkins v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 10:06 am
He was not captured outside the United States, he is not being held at Guantanamo Bay or elsewhere outside the United States, he has not been afforded a CSRT, he has not been 'determined by the United States to have been properly detained as an enemy combatant,' and he is not 'awaiting such determination.' The MCA was not intended to, and does not, apply to aliens like al-Marri, who have legally entered, and are seized while… [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 7:14 pm by Kevin Jon Heller
  I just wanted to flag here the following truly remarkable piece of legal reasoning in the motion: The United States has further determined that AQAP is an organized armed group that is either part of al-Qaeda, or is an associated force, or cobelligerent, of al-Qaeda that has directed armed attacks against the United States in the noninternational armed conflict between the United States and al-Qaeda that the Supreme Court recognized in… [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 5:27 am
“As an alien captured and detained within the United States,” the Court said, “he has a right to habeas corpus protected by the Constitution’s Suspension Clause. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 1:33 pm by Nicandro Iannacci
It also granted Mesa qualified immunity on the grounds that Hernández was “an alien who had no significant voluntary connection to … the United States. [read post]
23 May 2017, 4:32 am by Guest Blogger
Special factors did not counsel hesitation, even where a foreign national sought recompense for the misconduct of U.S. officials outside the United States. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 4:18 am by SHG
By their decision in Boumediene v. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Many people are saying we need a new Court, with proposals for significant reforms such as term limits and court expansion gaining much more mainstream support than imagined twenty years ago (even after Bush v. [read post]