Search for: "Scales v. United States"
Results 861 - 880
of 2,451
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2015, 10:53 am
With the Obama Administration construing the United States Supreme Court’s King v. [read post]
20 Jul 2008, 3:29 pm
U.S. v. $405,089.23 In United States Currency, et al. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 2:56 pm
United States, a 1976 U.S. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 7:42 am
[I will blog the NetChoice v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 1:01 am
At the end of the 19th century, the United States government was much smaller than it is today. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 8:03 am
Murgia, 427 U.S. 307 (1976), in which the United States Supreme Court upheld a state law setting a mandatory retirement age of 50 for police officers, deferring to the legitimate interest identified in the state’s pleadings. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
The directive states that, The collection of foreign private commercial information or trade secrets is authorized only to protect the national security of the United States or its partners and allies. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 9:32 am
In United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 7:14 am
Just when we thought Member States had succeeded in removing many of the most concerning crimes from the convention’s text, they could be making a reappearance. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 5:31 am
Moreover, there is already an indication of potential conflict in recent cases filed in the United States in which these issues have been raised (Licea v. [read post]
26 Apr 2008, 10:56 pm
United States Dep't of Agric., 415 F.3d 1078, 1093 (9th Cir. 2005) (citing Arizona Cattle Growers' Ass'n, 273 F.3d at 1236.) [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 1:01 am
” It wasn’t until 1938 that the Court, in a footnote to a case, United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 1:59 pm
In Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 10:13 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 1:01 pm
IMO it means prison downsizing inevitably must be on the table, and probably scaling back grants for border security, and maybe even the number of DPS troopers. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 7:25 am
Additional Resources: United States of America v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 4:01 am
For example, in 2017, the CERD stated it was “deeply concerned” that “[v]iolations of the land rights of indigenous peoples continue” and that “[c]ostly, time-consuming and ineffective litigation is often the only remedy, in place of seeking free, prior and informed consent — resulting in the State party continuing to issue permits which allow for damage to lands. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 3:50 pm
PJD Earlier: Associate Bonus Watch 2009 Happy New Year - United States - Irell & Manella - Law - Services [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 12:51 am
There are three paragraphs that stress the "central objective of CADE's efforts" ("o objetivo central da atuação do Cade"), which is that of every competition authority in the civilized world: to protect, in the interest of consumer welfare, the competitive process ("concorrência") (as the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit also emphasized in its FTC v. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 8:06 am
United States: Counsel must be at questioning after a suspect is charged. 1964 Escobedo v. [read post]
