Search for: "Stephens v State"
Results 861 - 880
of 6,521
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
In sequel to McGirt, justices will again review scope of state prosecutorial power in Indian country
26 Apr 2022, 10:06 am
Those cases, led by United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Rev. 1529 (2021); Stephen A. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 3:02 am
“The Supreme Court should…reaffirm that the Constitution’s prohibition against ex post facto lawmaking forbids states from skirting constitutional scrutiny by simply labeling penalties as ‘civil'” [Ilya Shapiro and Nathan Harvey on Cato certiorari brief in Bethea v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:22 am
Stephens v. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 10:00 am
In Thaler v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 7:03 am
In Elane Photography LLC v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 12:15 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:54 am
United States and Benisek v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 8:04 am
United States, No. 14-378. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
The decision came in Dobbs v. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 8:12 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Monday ruled that the Texas State Supreme Court must consider questions of enforcement of controversial abortion law SB8 before Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 1:47 pm
Mayo v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 2:30 pm
People v. [read post]
Fourth Circuit Rules Against North Carolina State Professor Who Spoke Out Against Diversity Policies
8 Jul 2023, 4:26 am
For example, in Rankin v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 5:03 am
While Lockridge's appeals were pending, an interesting thing happened: the SCOTUS decided Alleyne v United States which held that a judgment of sentence could not be based on a fact that: a) defendant did not admit or, b) was determined to exist beyond a reasonable doubt by a jury.In last week's opinion, the Supreme Court, addressing defendant's Alleyne challenge to his sentence, held that Michigan's mandatory sentencing guidelines were unconstitutional based on… [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 4:09 pm
As the famous (or perhaps infamous) “Declaration of Cyber Independence” in 1996 by John Perry Barlow stated, “Where there are real conflicts, where there are wrongs, we will identify them and address them by our means. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 4:39 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
James Wolffe QC, now appears in support of the Respondents. 15.16 Lavery QC states that the will of Parliament should not overrule the will of the Irish people and that the triggering of article 50 without their consent would do just that. 15.14 Lavery QC says that Northern Ireland has a complex constitutional settlement that is legally binding as a result of section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998. 15.10 Lavery QC says that section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act… [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 3:44 am
Briefly: In The New York Times, Peter Henning reports on Salman v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
Stephen Jones, a spokesman for the State Police, said the matter is out of their hands. [read post]
