Search for: "The People v. Chambers"
Results 861 - 880
of 1,914
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2009, 9:54 pm
Taking much the same line as the European Patent Office regarding inventive step and the problem-solution approach, the judge reached the same decision -- regarding Glaxo's patent for Seretide (that's Advair in the US) as was reached in the United Kingdom.The decision last Thursday of the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division), England and Wales in Patel and Hussain v R [2009] EWCA Crim 2311, is a useful reminder that people who sell counterfeit VIAGRA, not to mention other… [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 11:23 am
President Thomas V. [read post]
26 Nov 2006, 1:14 pm
Massachusetts v. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 10:23 am
Section 230 * Weimer v. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 3:02 am
Nell Minow v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 8:54 am
Cyprus v. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 2:13 pm
Judge McCree presided over People v. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 2:13 pm
Judge McCree presided over People v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
Marbury v. [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 3:28 am
I personally met Douglas twice, once at a dinner honoring him, attended by about two dozen people, in my home in Lawrence, Kansas, before he made a speech at the University of Kansas, and once afterwards in his chambers (i.e., his office) for lunch when I was visiting Washington. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
As the Supreme Court held in Heck v. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 8:57 pm
Today I preview Whirlpool Corp. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 11:41 pm
Supreme Court granted certiorari today in the "Fantasy Baseball" case of CBC Distribution v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 6:46 pm
Chief Judge Merrick Garland brings up the case of Johnson v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 8:44 am
The decision in Lockett v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 6:19 pm
See Al-Aulaqi v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm
” A rehearing of the case, before a “Grand Chamber,” affirmed the earlier decision. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 7:37 am
Inherent contempt, or the authority of either chamber to punish nonmembers for obstructing its work, including for defiance of its subpoenas—upheld in early Supreme Court decisions (Anderson v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 9:17 am
In my first few posts, I've argued that the legal and factual criticisms leveled against 303 Creative v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 8:21 am
It says this ruling, Marsh v. [read post]
