Search for: "Tom Goldstein"
Results 861 - 880
of 1,028
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2009, 1:02 pm
Over at SCOTUSblog, Tom Goldstein argues that the decision is a broad one but mentions that the court’s use of the phrase ‘attenuated from the arrest’ may limit the ultimate scope of this opinion. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 8:55 am
From the presumably learned (Tom Wheeler) to the crackpots (Free Press), comes a passion for the issue that smacks of the kind of fanaticism one would expect to see where a problem and its solution are things of such genuine importance they justify the most over-the-top words and tactics. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 7:07 am
Featuring our own Tom Goldstein, the session discusses several key upcoming cases and the potential impact of Justice Sotomayor's appointment on the Court's forthcoming opinions. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:30 am
And in an interview on NPR’s All Things Considered, SCOTUSblog’s Tom Goldstein observes that the jumble of alignments among the Justices in decisions this Term makes the Court hard to cast as “just a hard right or a hard left place. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 5:00 am
Hellerstedt, in which the Court struck down two provisions of a Texas law regulating abortions, comes from Molly Redden and Tom Dart in two stories for The Guardian. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 7:28 am
As Tom Goldstein explains at SCOTUSblog, the Court has traditionally not issued opinions based on the vote of a justice who has died or left the Court before the opinion is issued. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 7:28 am
These are petitions raising issues that Tom has determined to have a reasonable chance of being granted, although we post them here without consideration of whether they present appropriate vehicles in which to decide those issues. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 7:00 am
Tom Goldstein gives the details of the manipulation at SCOTUSblog and writes: It is as if the RNC decided to take an incredibly serious and successful argument that has the chance to produce a pathbreaking legal victory for a conservative interpretation of the Constitution, drag it through the mud, and vomit on it. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 9:37 am
Tom Goldstein, quoted in the article states that "Of the 96 cases, Judge Sotomayor and the panel rejected the claim of discrimination roughly 78 times and agreed with the claim of discrimination 10 times. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:44 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:03 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
This edition of “Petitions to watch” features petitions raising issues that Tom has determined to have a reasonable chance of being granted, although we post them here without consideration of whether they present appropriate vehicles in which to decide those issues. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 3:41 pm
Finally, in a high profile case that did not make our watch list — Goldstein v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 6:30 am
Tom Goldstein suggests that these alternatives, including drawing district lines with race in mind, are "per se constitutional," see here, while Michael Rosman seems to suggest that some of these alternatives could be subject to strict scrutiny under the Court's precedents, see here. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 8:10 am
Tom is not the sharpest knife in the drawer, so I'm not surprised that he's wrong. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 11:10 pm
Jimenez then took on Tom Goldstein of Akin Gump and the Stanford Supreme Court Litigation Clinic to represent him on the merits. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am
[Disclosure: Tejinder Singh of the law firm Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by international human rights advocates in support of the respondents in this case.] [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
This edition of “Petitions to watch” features petitions raising issues that Tom has determined to have a reasonable chance of being granted, although we post them here without consideration of whether they present appropriate vehicles in which to decide those issues. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:13 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the petitioners in this case.] [read post]
