Search for: "United States v. State of South Carolina" Results 861 - 880 of 1,414
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2010, 4:07 am by SHG
  Justice Clark read his opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:11 am by John Elwood
South Carolina, 13-8427, the last holdover from OT2013, fell victim to a R.O.U.S. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Nothing in this Act shall apply to any of the following:(1) Actions or transactions specifically authorized by laws administered by any regulatory body or officer acting under statutory authority of this State or the United States.815 Ill. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:21 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” Defendant’s parent began using its mark in the US as early as 1911, and defendant/those in privity with it used the mark continuously in Canada and the United States, including New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Florida, Texas, North Carolina, South Carolina, the Rockies, Texas, and Louisiana. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 12:15 pm by John Elwood
Ohio 16-5580 Issues: (1) Whether the first attempt to execute the petitioner was cruel and unusual under the Eighth and 14th Amendments to the United States Constitution and if so, whether the appropriate remedy is to bar any further execution attempt on the petitioner; (2) whether a second attempt to execute the petitioner will be a cruel and unusual punishment and a denial of due process in violation of the Eighth and 14th Amendments to the United States… [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 11:15 am by Sophia Cope
She and others recognize that the story would have been very different without the video showing that a white police officer shot the unarmed black man several times in the back as he ran away from a traffic stop in North Charleston, South Carolina. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 8:12 am by Anna Christensen
Petition for certiorari Title: United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:20 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-142. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
” Just four years after the Constitution’s adoption, the Supreme Court construed this language to allow a citizen of South Carolina to sue the state of Georgia. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm by Tim Paone
  In Rapanos v United States, the Court rejected what it considered overly broad interpretations of that phrase, noting that under some of the views presented, “waters of the United States” could “engulf entire cities and immense arid wastelands. [read post]