Search for: "Billings v. United States"
Results 8781 - 8800
of 10,162
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2010, 11:38 am
Supreme Court agreeing to hear that case of Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 6:33 am
In The Hill, Alexander Bolton writes that Republicans see federal courts as the "last line of defense" against Democratic bills like the healthcare bill and the McCain-Feingold campaign finance act at issue in the long-awaited decision in Citizens United. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 11:57 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:31 pm
The Minnesota case United States ex rel. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 12:15 pm
The decisions are Connecticut v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
: Catnic Components Ltd & Anor v Hill and Smith Ltd (Spicy IP) United States US Patents BPAI rules for ex parte appeals: Request for comment and notice of roundtable (Patently-O) Bilski and Warsaw share insights (AwakenIP) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: False marking statute applies on a per article basis: Forest Group, Inc v Bon Tool Co (GRAY On Claims) (EPLAW) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) You say tomato... [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 4:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 11:05 pm
v=D1R-jKKp3NAJ.K.Rowling:J.K.Rowling’s life is unbelievable. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 2:00 am
(IPKat) United States US General November and December 2009 – quick links of all the top stories (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) US Patents If nothing else, patent attorneys will follow the semantics – machine-or-transformation standard and claim terms (ISinIP) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Nokia - Nokia hurls new salvo in spat with Apple, complains to ITC (Ars Technica) (ITC) US… [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:43 pm
Abbott Docket: 08-645 Argument date: January 12, 2010 Question presented: Under a treaty signed by the United States, a child taken from his home country in violation of a "right of custody" generally must be returned to that country. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 6:27 pm
HOSPITAL SETTLE FRAUD CASE FOR $3 MILLION, United States v. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
(TTABlog) Monarch Casino & Resort - Trademark battle over the fame of ATLANTIS for casino services headed to trial in Nevada District Court: Kerzner International Inc v Monarch Casino & Resort Inc (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) Soccer United Marketing – SUM and Major League Soccer sue of Black & Decker over ‘ambush marketing’ (Trademark Blog) [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 1:01 am
United States, 364 U.S. 40 (1960) While the consent of individual officials representing the United States cannot "estop" the United States, it can lead to the fruition of a number of expectancies embodied in the concept of "property" expectancies that, if sufficiently important, the Government must condemn and pay for before it takes over the management of the landowner's property. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 9:35 am
” “..nor shall (any person)be compelled, in any criminal case, to be a witness against himself;…” Amendment V of the United States Constitution. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 8:27 am
The key is instead what relationship a right must bear to “citizens of the United States” in order to count - that is, the meaning of “of. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 9:49 am
" In cases such as South Dakota v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 6:42 am
The United States Constitution contains what is known as the Bill of Rights; the first ten amendments to the Constitution which provide American citizens with their Fundamental Rights. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:36 pm
Or did they disagree with Chief Justice Marshall when he wrote, "The Government of the United States has been emphatically termed a government of laws, and not of men. [read post]
