Search for: "Does 1-27" Results 8781 - 8800 of 12,455
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2010, 12:57 am by Lawrence Liang
Please note that the sub-themes are merely illustrative of the goals of the conference and are not exhaustive.1. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 6:39 pm by Kenneth Vercammen NJ Law Blog
A-4672-07T2 4 On February 27, 2008, Hnat filed a verified complaint and order to show cause seeking Sweeney's removal as executrix solely on the grounds that she was unfit and unable to serve due to her medical condition and hospitalizations. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 11:27 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
“Moreover, counter to CLEAR’s claim of enhanced efficiency, while CLEAR may save time for its high-paying customers, it does so at the direct expense of average airport travelers who, having finally made it to the front of a security line, often find themselves being pushed aside to make way for a CLEAR subscriber,” Newman wrote.A spokesperson for Clear told SFGATE that the company serves about 1 million people in California across nine airports: Long Beach… [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 12:32 pm by Cari Rincker
Making changes to your plan does not cost much, and you will buy peace of mind knowing your plan reflects your current wishes. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 9:38 am by Dan Maurer
Article 4(1) establishes that membership is conditional, and that condition is the acceptance of all the charter’s obligations, and willingness to carry out those obligations. [read post]
Arizona state law does not otherwise provide any specific provisions for challenging results of statewide elections. [read post]
3 Jan 2015, 7:37 pm by Bill Marler
 Such immunity does not last long, though. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
Employee B, however, was permanently appointed on March 1 of the same year, while Employee A was permanently appointed a month later, on April 1.Under the terms of the Local 788 collective bargaining agreement A would have greater seniority for layoff purposes than B. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
Employee B, however, was permanently appointed on March 1 of the same year, while Employee A was permanently appointed a month later, on April 1.Under the terms of the Local 788 collective bargaining agreement A would have greater seniority for layoff purposes than B. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
Employee B, however, was permanently appointed on March 1 of the same year, while Employee A was permanently appointed a month later, on April 1.Under the terms of the Local 788 collective bargaining agreement A would have greater seniority for layoff purposes than B. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
Employee B, however, was permanently appointed on March 1 of the same year, while Employee A was permanently appointed a month later, on April 1.Under the terms of the Local 788 collective bargaining agreement A would have greater seniority for layoff purposes than B. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm by Bexis
  Beyond observing that the white box was about the same size as the silver object, [plaintiff mother] does not recall whether the box had been opened or any markings on the box. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
.___ (June 27, 2023) in a 4-1-4 plurality decision involving the validity of Pennsylvania’s “consent by registration” statute.In Mallory, the U.S. [read post]