Search for: "Mark"
Results 8781 - 8800
of 151,849
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2023, 4:16 am
" Applicant Deborah Whitcas argued that "TOUCHDOWN" is the dominant element in her mark, since it appears as the first word in the mark. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 3:20 am
The USPTO refused to register the mark CAREBOARD for computer hardware and software for monitoring hospital patients, staff, and equipment, finding the mark likely to cause confusion with the registered mark ECAREBOARD for interactive computer platforms for providing information to patients. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 4:40 am
And so the Board found that the applied-for mark does not operate as a double entendre. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 7:45 am
” The Board found that applicant’s mark, at most, suggests a “fusion of cuisines. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 4:13 am
Here, BEIN, the mark in the Prior Opposition, creates a different commercial impression than does BEIN SPORT, the mark involved in this proceeding. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 3:22 am
Applicant Boyd testified that he did not license use of his mark to Lakeside, nor was he aware of anyone else using the RIALTO CINEMAS mark for movie theaters. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 2:52 am
August 6, 2019 - 11 AM: In re PCS Petroleum LLC, Serial No. 87728983 [Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark KP QUIK STOP & Deign for retail convenience stores, in view of the registered mark KWIK STOP for "Retail convenience store services featuring gasoline, other petroleum products and alcoholic beverages"].August 7, 2019 - 10 AM: Park Hotel Management Pte Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 3:13 am
The USPTO refused to register the mark CHEAT CODE for "mascara," finding confusion likely with the registered mark CHEAT CODES for, inter alia, various clothing items (including hats and shirts). [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 2:57 am
Or maybe it should file an application to register the mark for "jewelry, not including horological and chronometric instruments. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 12:47 am
The appeal court adopted the same approach it followed in the SWARTLAND decision in determining whether the mark was used “as a trade mark” or “badge of origin”. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 1:23 pm
The “Royal Palm Properties” mark clearly “resembles” the “Royale Palms” marks—the spelling of the dominant words is nearly identical8—and the “Royale Palms” marks were registered several years before the “Royal Palm Properties” mark.8.Welcome to the author’s life. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 1:37 am
As Tian noted in her recent post on Trump's Chinese trade marks, Trump and the Trump organisation's trade mark filing practices have come under the spotlight in recent months. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 3:33 am
Moreover they are likely to travel in the same channels of trade to ordinary consumers.The marks: The Board found the marks to be similar in sound, appearance, connotation, and commercial impression. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 3:26 am
Opposer Hachette claimed that the applied-for mark ELLE SCHNEIDER fails to function as a service mark for video production and script writing services. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 2:43 am
Consequently, the cited mark "is not entitled to a broad scope of protection that will necessarily bar the registration of every mark comprising, in whole or in part, the expression BIG KAHUNA. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 6:50 am
It is the first word in the mark and furthermore would be seen as "the product mark identifying the source of a specific item," while "by Steven" would be seen as a house mark for a range of products. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 3:55 am
In a non-precedential ruling, the CAFC upheld the Board's decision [TTABlogged here] affirming a refusal to register the proposed mark EVERBODY VS. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 4:09 am
However, the Board agreed that if the mark describes "a feature of the goods, the intended or expected users/purchasers of the goods, or something significant about the source of the goods, the mark may be merely descriptive. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 3:02 am
(Opposition No. 91192496) [The Board dismissed this opposition to registration of the mark SUN BRELLA'S for "living plants," finding the mark not likely to cause confusion with the registered mark SUNBRELLA for fabrics for indoor and outdoor furniture]. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 2:51 am
" The Office deemed the mark confusingly similar to the registered mark LINGO for telecommunication services. [read post]
