Search for: "New v. New" Results 8781 - 8800 of 166,240
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2010, 1:35 pm
The New Mexico Supreme Court recently addressed the applicability of the misdemeanor arrest rule to DWI/DUI arrests in City of Santa Fe v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 6:37 am by Wendi Overmyer, N.D. Ohio
Yesterday, the Supreme Court issued opinions in four criminal cases:In J.D.B. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 6:20 am by David G. Badertscher
NEW YORK COUNTYEmployment Officer's Termination Is Upheld; Dismissal Ruled Not Shocking to Sense of Fairness Buonviaggio v. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 4:00 pm
While it is invidious to single out individuals, a special "thank-you" is owed to Marie-Andrée for filling in with some extra cover when members of the regular blog squad have been absent or unavailable.So now we introduce our three new colleagues for the period 1 January 2015 (that's today, so please get used to the new year) to 30 June. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 6:55 pm
The New Mexico Court of Appeals addressed 4th Amendment search & seizure issues in State v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:10 am by INFORRM
The appellant was named and the case name is now Khuja (formerly known as PNM) v Times Newspapers. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 10:46 am by Marc-Joseph Gansah
The NJCUMMA had expressly excluded employment accommodations for medical marijuana users.[1] However, in Wild v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 8:09 am by sydniemery
Shannon’s article Prescribing a Balance: The Texas Legislative Responses to Sell v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 2:59 am
On appeal from: [2009] EWCA Civ 1058 Considers whether the Secretary of State was entitled to recover sums overpaid in cases of social security benefit awards mistakenly inflated due to a calculation error, under the common law of unjust enrichment or whether the Social Security Benefits Act 1992, s 71 provided the only route to recovery. [...] [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:43 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
On appeal from: [2013] EWHC 2573 (Admin) The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal by a majority of 4-1 regarding the Terrorism Act 2000, Sch 7, and whether it engages the ECHR, Arts 5, 6, and 8. [read post]